S3082 Osteoporosis Screening in Patients With Celiac Disease, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and Dual Diagnosis: A Retrospective Chart Review

Introduction: Patients with celiac disease (CeD) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are at increased risk for low bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis due to chronic inflammation, malabsorption, and corticosteroid use. Current guidelines recommend BMD screening in celiac patients and certain IBD patients, but adherence to screening practices remains suboptimal. It is unclear whether a dual diagnosis of CeD and IBD further compounds osteoporosis risk, and screening practices in this subgroup are not well characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with CeD, IBD (CD or UC), or both, who received care at a tertiary care center. Collected data included demographics, diagnosis type, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan history. The primary outcomes were DEXA screening rates and prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia among those screened. Results: A total of 336 patients were included (n = 84 per group). Mean age differed significantly (P = 0.0004), with UC patients being the oldest (mean 43.3 years) and those with a dual diagnosis of CeD and IBD being the youngest (mean 32.2 years). Sex distribution also varied (P = 0.005), with CD and UC groups having more males (56% and 54%), and CeD and CeD and IBD groups having more females (68% and 60%). Racial distribution had a predominance of White individuals in all groups. Body mass index (BMI) differed by group (P = 0.0008), CeD group had the highest mean BMI (24.3) and the CD group the lowest (21.1). Overall, DEXA screening rates were low, ranging from 14% to 32%, with significant differences between groups (P = 0.0038). Patients with CeD were more likely to have screening compared to those with IBD or a dual diagnosis. Among those screened, rates of decreased bone mineral density were comparable between the CeD cohort (48%) and dual diagnosis CeD+IBD cohort (46%) (P = .92). Conclusion: Rates of osteoporosis screening were low in all cohorts. While DEXA is recommended in certain IBD patients with specific risk factors, corticosteroid use, chronic active inflammation, or malnutrition, bone density scanning is recommended for all patients with celiac disease. Patients with a dual diagnosis of CeD and IBD have similar rates of decreased BMD compared to patients with a sole diagnosis of CeD. Given the high prevalence of low bone mineral density in these populations, timely screening and intervention are essential to reduce fracture risk and improve long-term outcomes.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139788.28548.56
Primary Topic
Celiac Disease Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3082 Osteoporosis Screening in Patients With Celiac Disease, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and Dual Diagnosis: A Retrospective Chart Review

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Celiac Disease Research and Management
article

S3082 Osteoporosis Screening in Patients With Celiac Disease, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and Dual Diagnosis: A Retrospective Chart Review

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with celiac disease (CeD) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are at increased risk for low bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis due to chronic inflammation, malabsorption, and corticosteroid use. Current guidelines recommend BMD screening in celiac patients and certain IBD patients, but adherence to screening practices remains suboptimal. It is unclear whether a dual diagnosis of CeD and IBD further compounds osteoporosis risk, and screening practices in this subgroup are not well characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with CeD, IBD (CD or UC), or both, who received care at a tertiary care center. Collected data included demographics, diagnosis type, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan history. The primary outcomes were DEXA screening rates and prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia among those screened. Results: A total of 336 patients were included (n = 84 per group). Mean age differed significantly (P = 0.0004), with UC patients being the oldest (mean 43.3 years) and those with a dual diagnosis of CeD and IBD being the youngest (mean 32.2 years). Sex distribution also varied (P = 0.005), with CD and UC groups having more males (56% and 54%), and CeD and CeD and IBD groups having more females (68% and 60%). Racial distribution had a predominance of White individuals in all groups. Body mass index (BMI) differed by group (P = 0.0008), CeD group had the highest mean BMI (24.3) and the CD group the lowest (21.1). Overall, DEXA screening rates were low, ranging from 14% to 32%, with significant differences between groups (P = 0.0038). Patients with CeD were more likely to have screening compared to those with IBD or a dual diagnosis. Among those screened, rates of decreased bone mineral density were comparable between the CeD cohort (48%) and dual diagnosis CeD+IBD cohort (46%) (P = .92). Conclusion: Rates of osteoporosis screening were low in all cohorts. While DEXA is recommended in certain IBD patients with specific risk factors, corticosteroid use, chronic active inflammation, or malnutrition, bone density scanning is recommended for all patients with celiac disease. Patients with a dual diagnosis of CeD and IBD have similar rates of decreased BMD compared to patients with a sole diagnosis of CeD. Given the high prevalence of low bone mineral density in these populations, timely screening and intervention are essential to reduce fracture risk and improve long-term outcomes.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Celiac Disease Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.