DSM-H as an African-Born Global Framework for Structural Pathology

The DSM-H (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Human Structural Pathologies) proposes a new way to name harms that do not live inside one person’s “mental disorder” but arise from stable patterns of institutional behaviour. It concentrates on structurally anti-human behaviour clusters (SAHBC / O-SAHBC) that generate preventable damage in health, justice, administration and other vital systems. This paper places DSM-H in an African psycho-political lineage (Fanon, Amos Wilson, Kimbangu) and within the broader MEN-D work on linguistic colonisation, epistemic warfare and digital harassment. It argues that DSM-H is a logical next step in that lineage: an African-born, globally usable system that treats structural pathology as something observable and measurable, independent of what institutional actors claim to feel or intend. Whether an institution “means well” comes second. What matters first is the pattern of decisions and their consequences for human lives. We outline the core DSM-H architecture: the Nsiku–Nzola–Bisalu ethical training triad and the MOYO indicators (MOYO-S, a probability scale for life-aligned behaviour, and MOYO-MBI, an index of life deviation and harm). We show how these tools convert African epistemic concepts (Nsiku, Nzola, Bisalu, mbi) into operational metrics. DSM-H starts its testing in the hospital, where structural cruelty cannot hide behind rhetoric, then moves outward to any context where power, reward and identity combine to normalise injury. DSM-H does not depend on voluntary confession by institutions or professionals. Diagnosis proceeds from pattern and consequence, not from declared motive. This avoids the familiar situation where those who benefit from structural harm can block its naming. DSM-H is built as a protective instrument for populations, with Africa as its starting point and any context of oppression as its horizon. Oppressive systems often recycle the same behavioural templates. DSM-H formalises a safeguard against those templates, from an African vantage point.

Publication Details

Journal
AfricArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60763/africarxiv/10327
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DSM-H as an African-Born Global Framework for Structural Pathology

AfricArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Mental Health and Psychiatry
article

DSM-H as an African-Born Global Framework for Structural Pathology

article en

Abstract

The DSM-H (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Human Structural Pathologies) proposes a new way to name harms that do not live inside one person’s “mental disorder” but arise from stable patterns of institutional behaviour. It concentrates on structurally anti-human behaviour clusters (SAHBC / O-SAHBC) that generate preventable damage in health, justice, administration and other vital systems. This paper places DSM-H in an African psycho-political lineage (Fanon, Amos Wilson, Kimbangu) and within the broader MEN-D work on linguistic colonisation, epistemic warfare and digital harassment. It argues that DSM-H is a logical next step in that lineage: an African-born, globally usable system that treats structural pathology as something observable and measurable, independent of what institutional actors claim to feel or intend. Whether an institution “means well” comes second. What matters first is the pattern of decisions and their consequences for human lives. We outline the core DSM-H architecture: the Nsiku–Nzola–Bisalu ethical training triad and the MOYO indicators (MOYO-S, a probability scale for life-aligned behaviour, and MOYO-MBI, an index of life deviation and harm). We show how these tools convert African epistemic concepts (Nsiku, Nzola, Bisalu, mbi) into operational metrics. DSM-H starts its testing in the hospital, where structural cruelty cannot hide behind rhetoric, then moves outward to any context where power, reward and identity combine to normalise injury. DSM-H does not depend on voluntary confession by institutions or professionals. Diagnosis proceeds from pattern and consequence, not from declared motive. This avoids the familiar situation where those who benefit from structural harm can block its naming. DSM-H is built as a protective instrument for populations, with Africa as its starting point and any context of oppression as its horizon. Oppressive systems often recycle the same behavioural templates. DSM-H formalises a safeguard against those templates, from an African vantage point.

AfricArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Mental Health and Psychiatry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.