S3128 Upper Gastrointestinal Immune-Mediated Toxicity: ICI Management Strategy and Factors Associated With Unfavorable Outcomes

Introduction: The widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as cancer therapy has led to an increase in upper gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events, notably gastritis, enteritis, esophagitis, and overlapping presentations. Balancing the efficacy of the ICI and the management of its toxicities is a major challenge for health care providers, who must determine whether to continue ICIs, adjust dosage, or discontinue the treatment. Furthermore, the identification of early predictors of unfavorable outcomes, notably recurrence or persistence of disease, is critical to guide risk stratification, personalize follow-up, and management. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 529 patients with upper GI immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Patients were grouped based on ICI status after the index toxicity event: ICI continued or resumed after the episode and ICI discontinued. Clinical outcomes included remission and unfavorable outcomes (recurrence or persistence of symptoms). Groups were compared using Chi-square tests and logistic regression. Results: Of 529 patients, 216 (40.8%) continued or resumed ICI therapy and 313 (59.2%) had ICI discontinued after the index event. Recurrence occurred more frequently in the continued group (11.1% vs 5.4%; P = 0.041), while persistence of toxicity findings until last follow-up was comparable (4.6% vs 3.5%). There was a trend of ICI discontinuation among patients in an inpatient setting, suggesting that continuation or resumption of ICI may have been selected for outpatient cases. Factors associated with increased risk of unfavorable outcomes included overlapping symptom presentation (odds ratio [OR] 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.63-5.83), acute inflammation on histology (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.03-3.21), steroid use (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.31-3.82), selective immunotherapy (SIT) use (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.07-3.64), and ICI being continued after the index event (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.12-3.24). These factors remained significant in univariate analysis and can inform future risk stratification models. Conclusion: Post-toxicity ICI continuation after upper GI irAEs was associated with a higher rate of recurrence compared to ICI being discontinued. Patients with overlapping upper GI phenotypes, acute inflammation on histology, or those who required steroids or SIT in the first event are at higher risk for recurrence or symptom persistence. In addition to early identification of high-risk patients, clinical decision-making should balance oncologic benefits with toxicity severity to individualize care.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139972.48978.4f
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3128 Upper Gastrointestinal Immune-Mediated Toxicity: ICI Management Strategy and Factors Associated With Unfavorable Outcomes

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

S3128 Upper Gastrointestinal Immune-Mediated Toxicity: ICI Management Strategy and Factors Associated With Unfavorable Outcomes

article en

Abstract

Introduction: The widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as cancer therapy has led to an increase in upper gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events, notably gastritis, enteritis, esophagitis, and overlapping presentations. Balancing the efficacy of the ICI and the management of its toxicities is a major challenge for health care providers, who must determine whether to continue ICIs, adjust dosage, or discontinue the treatment. Furthermore, the identification of early predictors of unfavorable outcomes, notably recurrence or persistence of disease, is critical to guide risk stratification, personalize follow-up, and management. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 529 patients with upper GI immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Patients were grouped based on ICI status after the index toxicity event: ICI continued or resumed after the episode and ICI discontinued. Clinical outcomes included remission and unfavorable outcomes (recurrence or persistence of symptoms). Groups were compared using Chi-square tests and logistic regression. Results: Of 529 patients, 216 (40.8%) continued or resumed ICI therapy and 313 (59.2%) had ICI discontinued after the index event. Recurrence occurred more frequently in the continued group (11.1% vs 5.4%; P = 0.041), while persistence of toxicity findings until last follow-up was comparable (4.6% vs 3.5%). There was a trend of ICI discontinuation among patients in an inpatient setting, suggesting that continuation or resumption of ICI may have been selected for outpatient cases. Factors associated with increased risk of unfavorable outcomes included overlapping symptom presentation (odds ratio [OR] 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.63-5.83), acute inflammation on histology (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.03-3.21), steroid use (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.31-3.82), selective immunotherapy (SIT) use (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.07-3.64), and ICI being continued after the index event (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.12-3.24). These factors remained significant in univariate analysis and can inform future risk stratification models. Conclusion: Post-toxicity ICI continuation after upper GI irAEs was associated with a higher rate of recurrence compared to ICI being discontinued. Patients with overlapping upper GI phenotypes, acute inflammation on histology, or those who required steroids or SIT in the first event are at higher risk for recurrence or symptom persistence. In addition to early identification of high-risk patients, clinical decision-making should balance oncologic benefits with toxicity severity to individualize care.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.