Dichotomies of Cure and Care in the Medicalization of Fat Bodies

Though Fat bodies have not been absent from historical knowledges collected and known around the globe, the West’s preoccupation with declaring Fatness as a looming moral and medical danger drives multidisciplinary discourses centering Fat people as the epicentre of the “Fatpocalypse” (Pausé 135), undesirable proprietors of excess body mass who threaten the (enforced) collective agreement on embodiments and categorizations of “health”. These body knowledges, whose basis for so-called-empirical truths are born from cultural western notions and regulatory striving, are continually held to a higher regard than the (Fat) bodies and inhabitants of these bodies who navigate the clinical setting. Fatphobia, an imperfect term that encapsulates the fat hatred, “weight bias, weight discrimination, and weight stigma” (Kost et al. 03) experienced by larger bodies particularly from healthcare practitioners, is woven so tightly into the clinical gaze that it can easily be disguised by authoritative medical knowledges, an excuse that permits and excuses malpractice of Fat individuals. As a result, care and cure become fractured, a dichotomous arrangement that shifts responsibility of health solely onto the Fat patient.

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)
Published
2025-11-07
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dichotomies of Cure and Care in the Medicalization of Fat Bodies

The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)
Obesity and Health Practices
article

Dichotomies of Cure and Care in the Medicalization of Fat Bodies

article en

Abstract

Though Fat bodies have not been absent from historical knowledges collected and known around the globe, the West’s preoccupation with declaring Fatness as a looming moral and medical danger drives multidisciplinary discourses centering Fat people as the epicentre of the “Fatpocalypse” (Pausé 135), undesirable proprietors of excess body mass who threaten the (enforced) collective agreement on embodiments and categorizations of “health”. These body knowledges, whose basis for so-called-empirical truths are born from cultural western notions and regulatory striving, are continually held to a higher regard than the (Fat) bodies and inhabitants of these bodies who navigate the clinical setting. Fatphobia, an imperfect term that encapsulates the fat hatred, “weight bias, weight discrimination, and weight stigma” (Kost et al. 03) experienced by larger bodies particularly from healthcare practitioners, is woven so tightly into the clinical gaze that it can easily be disguised by authoritative medical knowledges, an excuse that permits and excuses malpractice of Fat individuals. As a result, care and cure become fractured, a dichotomous arrangement that shifts responsibility of health solely onto the Fat patient.

The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dichotomies of Cure and Care in the Medicalization of Fat Bodies · The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS