Development of a Model to Predict Cesarean Delivery as the Outcome of a Failed Labor Induction in Singleton Obese Pregnant Women at Term

Yi Feng,1 Yingyi Luan,2 Li Zhou,1 Chenghong Yin2 1Department of Obstetrics, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Central Laboratory, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Li Zhou, Email [email protected] Chenghong Yin, Email [email protected]: Maternal obesity is a major global public health issue. Induction of labor (IoL) is common in obstetrics. Both the rate of IoL and induction failure rate are higher in obese women than in those with normal body mass index (BMI). This study aimed to construct a model to predict the failed IoL with a caesarean section (CS) as the outcome among term singleton obese pregnant women.Methods: Electric health records of term singleton obese pregnant women were retrieved from Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from February 2018 to December 2022 (discovery cohort), and January to December 2024 (validation cohort). CS was defined as the outcome of failed IoL. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors, and multivariate logistic regression (stepwise and backward) was used to construct the prediction model. Performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and internally validated with the validation cohort.Results: Pre-pregnant BMI (OR 1.074, 95% CI 1.016– 1.135, p=0.011), gestational weight gain (OR 1.033, 95% CI 1.006– 1.062) and neonatal weight (OR 1.673, 95% CI 1.175– 2.380, p=0.004) were identified as the risk factors of a failed IoL, whereas gravidity (OR 0.706, 95% CI 0.592– 0.844, p< 0.001), parity (OR 0.105, 95% CI 0.055– 0.198, p< 0.001), height (OR 0.935, 95% CI 0.907– 0.963, p< 0.001) and Bishop score (OR 0.892, 95% CI 0.799– 0.996, p=0.042) as the protective factors. The final model included parity, height, pre-pregnant BMI, gestational weight gain, Bishop score, and neonatal weight, achieving an AUC of 0.752 (95% CI, 0.717– 0.788) in the discovery cohort and 0.826 (95% CI 0.757– 894) in the validation cohort.Conclusion: This practical model predicts the failed IoL among term singleton obese women using routinely available variables. It may support obstetric decision-making, enhance counseling, and improve resource planning for women at increased risk of intra- and postpartum complications.Keywords: induction of labor, cesarean section, obesity, prediction model

Publication Details

Journal
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Published
2025-12-09
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a Model to Predict Cesarean Delivery as the Outcome of a Failed Labor Induction in Singleton Obese Pregnant Women at Term

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Development of a Model to Predict Cesarean Delivery as the Outcome of a Failed Labor Induction in Singleton Obese Pregnant Women at Term

article en

Abstract

Yi Feng,1 Yingyi Luan,2 Li Zhou,1 Chenghong Yin2 1Department of Obstetrics, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Central Laboratory, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Li Zhou, Email [email protected] Chenghong Yin, Email [email protected]: Maternal obesity is a major global public health issue. Induction of labor (IoL) is common in obstetrics. Both the rate of IoL and induction failure rate are higher in obese women than in those with normal body mass index (BMI). This study aimed to construct a model to predict the failed IoL with a caesarean section (CS) as the outcome among term singleton obese pregnant women.Methods: Electric health records of term singleton obese pregnant women were retrieved from Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from February 2018 to December 2022 (discovery cohort), and January to December 2024 (validation cohort). CS was defined as the outcome of failed IoL. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors, and multivariate logistic regression (stepwise and backward) was used to construct the prediction model. Performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and internally validated with the validation cohort.Results: Pre-pregnant BMI (OR 1.074, 95% CI 1.016– 1.135, p=0.011), gestational weight gain (OR 1.033, 95% CI 1.006– 1.062) and neonatal weight (OR 1.673, 95% CI 1.175– 2.380, p=0.004) were identified as the risk factors of a failed IoL, whereas gravidity (OR 0.706, 95% CI 0.592– 0.844, p< 0.001), parity (OR 0.105, 95% CI 0.055– 0.198, p< 0.001), height (OR 0.935, 95% CI 0.907– 0.963, p< 0.001) and Bishop score (OR 0.892, 95% CI 0.799– 0.996, p=0.042) as the protective factors. The final model included parity, height, pre-pregnant BMI, gestational weight gain, Bishop score, and neonatal weight, achieving an AUC of 0.752 (95% CI, 0.717– 0.788) in the discovery cohort and 0.826 (95% CI 0.757– 894) in the validation cohort.Conclusion: This practical model predicts the failed IoL among term singleton obese women using routinely available variables. It may support obstetric decision-making, enhance counseling, and improve resource planning for women at increased risk of intra- and postpartum complications.Keywords: induction of labor, cesarean section, obesity, prediction model

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.