Discrimination Is a Thick Concept
This article examines whether the folk concept of discrimination is inherently evaluative or purely descriptive. Two corpus analyses reveal a historical shift, with “discrimination” evolving from a neutral to an evaluative term. The results of a cancellability test show that denying the evaluative aspect of “discriminatory” leads to contradictions, indicating the communication of moral judgment by default. In a vignette study, we demonstrate that cases often cited as examples of descriptive discrimination are judged either non-discriminatory or morally wrongful. These results support the Moralized View, challenging the Descriptive View, and propose discrimination to be a thick concept blending descriptive and evaluative content.
Institutions
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering (CH)
- Film Independent (US)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Aalborg University (DK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy
- Published
- 2026-09-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.11015
- Primary Topic
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00