Is the terrain still vague? Reconsidering indeterminate spaces//¿El terrain sigue siendo vague? Reconsiderando los espacios indeterminados//Leterrainest-il toujoursvague ? un réexamen des espaces indéterminés

Wastelands, urban voids, interstices: especially since the 1990s, there has been a proliferation of terminologies projected on (supposedly) empty urban spaces by designers, scholars, and artists. These discussions emerged as responses to landscapes of deindustrialization, increasing sensitivity to the impacts of infrastructures on the urban fabric, the declining currency of modernist planning and a shift towards piecemeal regeneration and aestheticization of ‘left-over’ spaces. A key text typifying this fixation, offering an umbrella term for these spaces, was the Terrain Vague by architect Ignasi de Solà-Morales. His theorization of spatial indeterminacy, borrowing concepts from photography, was driven by ambivalence towards designers’ approaches to the urban residuum. We attempt to reterritorialize de Solà-Morales’ critique within the context it responded to, the ‘Barcelona Model’ of design-led regeneration. With terrains vague remaining focal points in urbanist discourse, there is increasing acknowledgement that urban spaces are rarely devoid of social activity, value, or meaning. Nevertheless, planners, architects, and policymakers continue to project voidness onto these spaces to justify their reconfiguration and revalorization. We argue that the discourse on emptiness has lost much of its novelty – especially when divorced from the political economic processes that create them – and suggest ways to move beyond this impasse.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UCL Discovery (University College London)
Published
2024-12-02
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the terrain still vague? Reconsidering indeterminate spaces//¿El terrain sigue siendo vague? Reconsiderando los espacios indeterminados//Leterrainest-il toujoursvague ? un réexamen des espaces indéterminés

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Is the terrain still vague? Reconsidering indeterminate spaces//¿El terrain sigue siendo vague? Reconsiderando los espacios indeterminados//Leterrainest-il toujoursvague ? un réexamen des espaces indéterminés

article en

Abstract

Wastelands, urban voids, interstices: especially since the 1990s, there has been a proliferation of terminologies projected on (supposedly) empty urban spaces by designers, scholars, and artists. These discussions emerged as responses to landscapes of deindustrialization, increasing sensitivity to the impacts of infrastructures on the urban fabric, the declining currency of modernist planning and a shift towards piecemeal regeneration and aestheticization of ‘left-over’ spaces. A key text typifying this fixation, offering an umbrella term for these spaces, was the Terrain Vague by architect Ignasi de Solà-Morales. His theorization of spatial indeterminacy, borrowing concepts from photography, was driven by ambivalence towards designers’ approaches to the urban residuum. We attempt to reterritorialize de Solà-Morales’ critique within the context it responded to, the ‘Barcelona Model’ of design-led regeneration. With terrains vague remaining focal points in urbanist discourse, there is increasing acknowledgement that urban spaces are rarely devoid of social activity, value, or meaning. Nevertheless, planners, architects, and policymakers continue to project voidness onto these spaces to justify their reconfiguration and revalorization. We argue that the discourse on emptiness has lost much of its novelty – especially when divorced from the political economic processes that create them – and suggest ways to move beyond this impasse.

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Institut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona (ES), The London College (GB), University College London (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.