“It's not that I don't trust the bot, but can it actually help?” Listening to Young Adults’ Experience With the Transparency Designs of an Image-based Sexual Abuse Victim Support AI Chatbot

Image-based sexual abuse (IBSA) is an umbrella term including the acts of nonconsensual taking, creating, or sharing of nude or sexual images, photos or videos. Organizations supporting IBSA victim-survivors have begun integrating AI chatbots into their services. The AI Act emphasizes transparency, requiring AI systems to disclose the use of AI to users. However, experimental research on transparency in chatbot design—such as disclosing bot identity, functionality, and limitations—has yielded mixed findings, and existing studies have not explored users’ in-depth experiences. To address this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with young adults (N=26, ages 18–29) to answer two research questions: RQ1: What are young adults’ positive and negative user experiences with a chatbot designed to support victim-survivors of IBSA? RQ2: What are young adults’ positive and negative user experiences with the disclosures of using AI in a chatbot designed to support victim-survivors of IBSA? We found that young adults liked the chatbot because it was easy to use, not embarrassing to talk to, and provided both informational and emotional support. However, they disliked that the information was often too long, sometimes irrelevant or not personalized, and that the emotional support did not meet their expectations compared to a human. Regarding the transparency design, they liked the non-transparent version because it enabled quicker access to support and fostered a greater sense of intimacy. Conversely, they appreciated the transparent version because disclosures such as “made by experts” and “protects your privacy” enhanced their trust and sense of security. However, the limitation disclosure (e.g., “I cannot understand like a real human”) received some negative comments, such as making users feel distant from the chatbot, less confident in its ability, and less inclined to engage further. These findings suggest that while transparency can build trust, opaque or unclear disclosures may undermine user confidence and engagement. Further research is needed to refine communication strategies that balance trust and usability in AI-driven support systems.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3748699.3749775
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“It's not that I don't trust the bot, but can it actually help?” Listening to Young Adults’ Experience With the Transparency Designs of an Image-based Sexual Abuse Victim Support AI Chatbot

AI in Service Interactions
article

“It's not that I don't trust the bot, but can it actually help?” Listening to Young Adults’ Experience With the Transparency Designs of an Image-based Sexual Abuse Victim Support AI Chatbot

article en

Abstract

Image-based sexual abuse (IBSA) is an umbrella term including the acts of nonconsensual taking, creating, or sharing of nude or sexual images, photos or videos. Organizations supporting IBSA victim-survivors have begun integrating AI chatbots into their services. The AI Act emphasizes transparency, requiring AI systems to disclose the use of AI to users. However, experimental research on transparency in chatbot design—such as disclosing bot identity, functionality, and limitations—has yielded mixed findings, and existing studies have not explored users’ in-depth experiences. To address this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with young adults (N=26, ages 18–29) to answer two research questions: RQ1: What are young adults’ positive and negative user experiences with a chatbot designed to support victim-survivors of IBSA? RQ2: What are young adults’ positive and negative user experiences with the disclosures of using AI in a chatbot designed to support victim-survivors of IBSA? We found that young adults liked the chatbot because it was easy to use, not embarrassing to talk to, and provided both informational and emotional support. However, they disliked that the information was often too long, sometimes irrelevant or not personalized, and that the emotional support did not meet their expectations compared to a human. Regarding the transparency design, they liked the non-transparent version because it enabled quicker access to support and fostered a greater sense of intimacy. Conversely, they appreciated the transparent version because disclosures such as “made by experts” and “protects your privacy” enhanced their trust and sense of security. However, the limitation disclosure (e.g., “I cannot understand like a real human”) received some negative comments, such as making users feel distant from the chatbot, less confident in its ability, and less inclined to engage further. These findings suggest that while transparency can build trust, opaque or unclear disclosures may undermine user confidence and engagement. Further research is needed to refine communication strategies that balance trust and usability in AI-driven support systems.

University of Antwerp (BE), Deakin University (AU), Tilburg University (NL), RMIT University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.