S1882 Long-Term Comparative Outcomes of Early Ileocolic Resection vs Anti-TNF Therapy in Crohn’s Disease Patients

Introduction: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy remains integral for the management of Crohn’s disease (CD). However, recent evidence, such as the Laparoscopic Ileocolonic Resection Versus Infliximab Treatment of Recurrent Distal Ileitis in Crohn’s Disease trial, shows that early surgical intervention, particularly ileocolonic resection (ICR), may provide similar or even superior outcomes, along with decreased long-term dependence on pharmacologic therapy. This study evaluated long-term clinical outcomes among CD patients treated with early ICR vs early initiation of anti-TNF therapy within one year of diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted using TriNetX Global Collaborative Network. We compared 7,357 patients undergoing early ICR with an equal number of patients initiating anti-TNF therapy within one year of CD diagnosis. Matching controlled for demographics, comorbidities, and baseline medication use. The primary composite outcome included all-cause hospitalization, steroid use, escalation of Crohn’s therapy, and bowel surgery. Secondary outcomes individual components of primary outcomes, perianal disease, intestinal obstruction, and emergency department (ED) visits. Outcomes were evaluated over a 10-year follow-up period. Risks, risk differences, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Results: The ICR group showed a significantly lower risk of the primary composite outcome (48.6% vs 58.2%; OR 0.68, CI 0.64–0.72; P < 0.001). ICR was also associated with reduced risk of biologic escalation (12.2% vs 15.7%; OR 0.74; P < 0.001), small molecule escalation (0.7% vs 2.0%; OR 0.35; P < 0.001), steroid use (31.8% vs 48.8%; OR 0.49; P < 0.001), and perianal disease (3.0% vs 6.7%; OR 0.44; P < 0.001). However, ICR was associated with higher rates of bowel surgery (4.0% vs 2.1%; OR 1.92; P < 0.001), all-cause hospitalization (30.4% vs 25.4%; OR 1.28; P < 0.001), and ED visits (28.7% vs 26.6%; OR 1.11; P = 0.004). No statistically significant difference was observed in the development of intestinal obstruction (13.9% vs 12.9%; P = 0.086). Conclusion: Among Crohn’s disease patients, early ICR is associated with significantly reduced long-term corticosteroid use, therapy escalation, and perianal complications compared to early anti-TNF therapy. While it carries a higher risk of repeat surgery and hospitalizations, these findings support early surgical resection as a viable therapeutic option in selected patients.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001134988.63231.c6
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1882 Long-Term Comparative Outcomes of Early Ileocolic Resection vs Anti-TNF Therapy in Crohn’s Disease Patients

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1882 Long-Term Comparative Outcomes of Early Ileocolic Resection vs Anti-TNF Therapy in Crohn’s Disease Patients

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy remains integral for the management of Crohn’s disease (CD). However, recent evidence, such as the Laparoscopic Ileocolonic Resection Versus Infliximab Treatment of Recurrent Distal Ileitis in Crohn’s Disease trial, shows that early surgical intervention, particularly ileocolonic resection (ICR), may provide similar or even superior outcomes, along with decreased long-term dependence on pharmacologic therapy. This study evaluated long-term clinical outcomes among CD patients treated with early ICR vs early initiation of anti-TNF therapy within one year of diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted using TriNetX Global Collaborative Network. We compared 7,357 patients undergoing early ICR with an equal number of patients initiating anti-TNF therapy within one year of CD diagnosis. Matching controlled for demographics, comorbidities, and baseline medication use. The primary composite outcome included all-cause hospitalization, steroid use, escalation of Crohn’s therapy, and bowel surgery. Secondary outcomes individual components of primary outcomes, perianal disease, intestinal obstruction, and emergency department (ED) visits. Outcomes were evaluated over a 10-year follow-up period. Risks, risk differences, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Results: The ICR group showed a significantly lower risk of the primary composite outcome (48.6% vs 58.2%; OR 0.68, CI 0.64–0.72; P < 0.001). ICR was also associated with reduced risk of biologic escalation (12.2% vs 15.7%; OR 0.74; P < 0.001), small molecule escalation (0.7% vs 2.0%; OR 0.35; P < 0.001), steroid use (31.8% vs 48.8%; OR 0.49; P < 0.001), and perianal disease (3.0% vs 6.7%; OR 0.44; P < 0.001). However, ICR was associated with higher rates of bowel surgery (4.0% vs 2.1%; OR 1.92; P < 0.001), all-cause hospitalization (30.4% vs 25.4%; OR 1.28; P < 0.001), and ED visits (28.7% vs 26.6%; OR 1.11; P = 0.004). No statistically significant difference was observed in the development of intestinal obstruction (13.9% vs 12.9%; P = 0.086). Conclusion: Among Crohn’s disease patients, early ICR is associated with significantly reduced long-term corticosteroid use, therapy escalation, and perianal complications compared to early anti-TNF therapy. While it carries a higher risk of repeat surgery and hospitalizations, these findings support early surgical resection as a viable therapeutic option in selected patients.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.