S1906 Neglected Differences: A Meta-Epidemiologic Review of Sex-Disaggregated Outcome Reporting in Ulcerative Colitis Drug Trials

Introduction: Sex-based differences shape disease presentation, drug metabolism, and treatment outcomes in ulcerative colitis (UC). While NIH and other regulatory bodies mandate inclusion of sex as a biological variable, clinical trials rarely analyze or report efficacy or safety outcomes by sex. This oversight undermines equitable care and hampers the translation of trial findings into personalized therapy. To evaluate the frequency and quality of sex-disaggregated outcome reporting in UC drug trials over the past decade and identify factors linked to improved reporting practices. Methods: We performed a meta-epidemiologic review of UC trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1, 2010, to present. Trials were eligible if they included adults (≥18 years), were marked as completed, posted results, and enrolled ≥10 participants. Among 461 inflammatory bowel disease trials screened, 167 UC-specific trials met inclusion criteria. Each was assessed for sex reporting, sex-disaggregated outcome data, and subgroup analysis. Trial characteristics—phase, sponsor type, site geography—were also recorded. Results: Of 167 UC trials, 92.4% (n = 154) reported the sex of enrolled participants. However, only 6 trials (1.4%) provided sex-disaggregated efficacy or safety outcomes. None included pre-specified subgroup analyses by sex. Trials with larger sample sizes, industry sponsorship, and international recruitment were slightly more likely to report sex data, but these traits did not consistently translate into stratified analysis. Discussions of underlying biological or sociocultural mechanisms for sex differences were rare. Conclusion: Despite near-universal reporting of participant sex, UC drug trials overwhelmingly fail to analyze or disclose sex-specific outcomes. This disconnect between policy and practice represents a significant barrier to sex-informed care and precision medicine. Adoption of standardized sex-disaggregated reporting is essential for equitable, evidence-based treatment strategies in UC.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001135084.19035.de
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1906 Neglected Differences: A Meta-Epidemiologic Review of Sex-Disaggregated Outcome Reporting in Ulcerative Colitis Drug Trials

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

S1906 Neglected Differences: A Meta-Epidemiologic Review of Sex-Disaggregated Outcome Reporting in Ulcerative Colitis Drug Trials

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Sex-based differences shape disease presentation, drug metabolism, and treatment outcomes in ulcerative colitis (UC). While NIH and other regulatory bodies mandate inclusion of sex as a biological variable, clinical trials rarely analyze or report efficacy or safety outcomes by sex. This oversight undermines equitable care and hampers the translation of trial findings into personalized therapy. To evaluate the frequency and quality of sex-disaggregated outcome reporting in UC drug trials over the past decade and identify factors linked to improved reporting practices. Methods: We performed a meta-epidemiologic review of UC trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1, 2010, to present. Trials were eligible if they included adults (≥18 years), were marked as completed, posted results, and enrolled ≥10 participants. Among 461 inflammatory bowel disease trials screened, 167 UC-specific trials met inclusion criteria. Each was assessed for sex reporting, sex-disaggregated outcome data, and subgroup analysis. Trial characteristics—phase, sponsor type, site geography—were also recorded. Results: Of 167 UC trials, 92.4% (n = 154) reported the sex of enrolled participants. However, only 6 trials (1.4%) provided sex-disaggregated efficacy or safety outcomes. None included pre-specified subgroup analyses by sex. Trials with larger sample sizes, industry sponsorship, and international recruitment were slightly more likely to report sex data, but these traits did not consistently translate into stratified analysis. Discussions of underlying biological or sociocultural mechanisms for sex differences were rare. Conclusion: Despite near-universal reporting of participant sex, UC drug trials overwhelmingly fail to analyze or disclose sex-specific outcomes. This disconnect between policy and practice represents a significant barrier to sex-informed care and precision medicine. Adoption of standardized sex-disaggregated reporting is essential for equitable, evidence-based treatment strategies in UC.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

S1906 Neglected Differences: A Meta-Epidemiologic Review of Sex-Disaggregated Outcome Reporting in Ulcerative Colitis Drug Trials · The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS