Environmental Peacebuilding in East Asia: ASEAN’s Role in Facilitating Inter-Korean Environmental Cooperation

This paper explores the potential of environmental peacebuilding as a strategic approach to mitigating long-standing tensions on the Korean Peninsula through the facilitative role of ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations). Drawing on institutional analysis and document-based qualitative research, the study examines how ASEAN’s regional mechanism, particularly the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), the East Asia Summit (EAS), and various technical platforms—can support inter-Korean environmental cooperation in areas such as biodiversity conservation, transboundary air pollution monitoring, and disaster risk reduction. The study underscores the unique position of ASEAN as a neutral convener with a track record in non-traditional security diplomacy and soft power mediation. Using the theoretical framework of environmental peacebuilding, the research identifies how low-politics ecological issues can function as environmental cooperation as confidence-building measures (CBMs), facilitating dialogue and collaboration in a politically sensitive context. Case studies such as the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) biodiversity corridor, cooperative air quality monitoring influenced by China’s industrial emissions, and disaster management training under AADMER (ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response) illustrate concrete opportunities for ASEAN-led intervention. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of Track 1.5 diplomacy, technical capacity- building platforms such as AWGESC (ASEAN Working Group on Environmentally Sustainable Cities), and ASEAN’s multilateral legitimacy in promoting trust-based engagement. Despite persisting institutional and geopolitical constraints, the research concludes that ASEAN’s inclusive diplomacy, emphasis on consensus, and flexible multilateralism position it effective to facilitate environmental cooperation as a steppingstone toward durable peace on the Korean Peninsula. By integrating environmental security into regional diplomacy, ASEAN not only broadens the discourse on peacebuilding but also reinforces its strategic role in East Asian security architecture.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202519905001/pdf
Primary Topic
Transboundary Water Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Peacebuilding in East Asia: ASEAN’s Role in Facilitating Inter-Korean Environmental Cooperation

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Transboundary Water Resource Management
article

Environmental Peacebuilding in East Asia: ASEAN’s Role in Facilitating Inter-Korean Environmental Cooperation

article en

Abstract

This paper explores the potential of environmental peacebuilding as a strategic approach to mitigating long-standing tensions on the Korean Peninsula through the facilitative role of ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations). Drawing on institutional analysis and document-based qualitative research, the study examines how ASEAN’s regional mechanism, particularly the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), the East Asia Summit (EAS), and various technical platforms—can support inter-Korean environmental cooperation in areas such as biodiversity conservation, transboundary air pollution monitoring, and disaster risk reduction. The study underscores the unique position of ASEAN as a neutral convener with a track record in non-traditional security diplomacy and soft power mediation. Using the theoretical framework of environmental peacebuilding, the research identifies how low-politics ecological issues can function as environmental cooperation as confidence-building measures (CBMs), facilitating dialogue and collaboration in a politically sensitive context. Case studies such as the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) biodiversity corridor, cooperative air quality monitoring influenced by China’s industrial emissions, and disaster management training under AADMER (ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response) illustrate concrete opportunities for ASEAN-led intervention. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of Track 1.5 diplomacy, technical capacity- building platforms such as AWGESC (ASEAN Working Group on Environmentally Sustainable Cities), and ASEAN’s multilateral legitimacy in promoting trust-based engagement. Despite persisting institutional and geopolitical constraints, the research concludes that ASEAN’s inclusive diplomacy, emphasis on consensus, and flexible multilateralism position it effective to facilitate environmental cooperation as a steppingstone toward durable peace on the Korean Peninsula. By integrating environmental security into regional diplomacy, ASEAN not only broadens the discourse on peacebuilding but also reinforces its strategic role in East Asian security architecture.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Transboundary Water Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Environmental Peacebuilding in East Asia: ASEAN’s Role in Facilitating Inter-Korean Environmental Cooperation · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS