S1944 Prospective Evaluation of Adherence to Early Clinical and Biochemical Assessments After Therapy Adjustment for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Introduction: The treat-to-target (TTT) approach emphasizes time-based targets, however real-world adherence to early clinical and objective assessments after treatment adjustment is not well-described. Methods: This single center prospective cohort study included patients starting a new advanced therapy (AT), escalating current AT, or reinducing current AT for ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD) from 8/1/2024 to 12/15/2024. The dates of decision for therapy adjustment and first doses were recorded prospectively; additional data were collected retrospectively. Data were collected in conjunction with IBD Qorus TTT improvement efforts. Primary outcomes were completion of clinical (office or video visit) or biochemical (C-reactive protein [CRP] or fecal calprotectin [FCP]) assessments within 16 weeks of treatment adjustment date. Assessments <2 weeks from this date were excluded. Results: 148 patients underwent treatment adjustment (49% UC, 51% CD). Median time to first dose was 28 days (n = 148, IQR 19-37), and was numerically shorter for single AT (26 days, n = 86, IQR 15-35) than combination AT (29 days, n = 20, IQR 20-44) and re-inductions/escalations (31 days, n = 42, IQR 21-36). 81% (n = 120) had on-time clinical assessments. On-time biochemical follow-up was less common, with 62% (n = 91) having any on-time biomarker (for CRP, n = 74 [50%]; for FCP n = 58 [39.1%]). Both clinical and biochemical (either CRP or FCP) assessment was performed on time in 59% (n = 87), falling to 27% (n = 40) if considering completion of both biomarkers. In multivariate logistic regression, new starts were more likely to have clinical follow-up (aOR 2.90, 95% CI 1.08-7.78) and Hispanics less likely (aOR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.94). Older age (aOR per year 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99) and longer time from decision to start (aOR per day 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99) were associated with lower odds of biochemical follow-up. Non-infusion induction and corticosteroid use were associated with higher odds of biochemical follow-up in univariable but not multivariable analysis. Conclusion: In this prospective single-center study, 1/5 of patients did not undergo clinical assessment and over 1/3 lacked biochemical assessment within 16 weeks of actual start date for a new AT or new AT dosing. If low rates of early TTT assessments are confirmed with multicenter data, adherence to these assessments could prove to be a more impactful quality improvement focus than later targets such as endoscopy.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001135236.51610.ca
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1944 Prospective Evaluation of Adherence to Early Clinical and Biochemical Assessments After Therapy Adjustment for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1944 Prospective Evaluation of Adherence to Early Clinical and Biochemical Assessments After Therapy Adjustment for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

article en

Abstract

Introduction: The treat-to-target (TTT) approach emphasizes time-based targets, however real-world adherence to early clinical and objective assessments after treatment adjustment is not well-described. Methods: This single center prospective cohort study included patients starting a new advanced therapy (AT), escalating current AT, or reinducing current AT for ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD) from 8/1/2024 to 12/15/2024. The dates of decision for therapy adjustment and first doses were recorded prospectively; additional data were collected retrospectively. Data were collected in conjunction with IBD Qorus TTT improvement efforts. Primary outcomes were completion of clinical (office or video visit) or biochemical (C-reactive protein [CRP] or fecal calprotectin [FCP]) assessments within 16 weeks of treatment adjustment date. Assessments <2 weeks from this date were excluded. Results: 148 patients underwent treatment adjustment (49% UC, 51% CD). Median time to first dose was 28 days (n = 148, IQR 19-37), and was numerically shorter for single AT (26 days, n = 86, IQR 15-35) than combination AT (29 days, n = 20, IQR 20-44) and re-inductions/escalations (31 days, n = 42, IQR 21-36). 81% (n = 120) had on-time clinical assessments. On-time biochemical follow-up was less common, with 62% (n = 91) having any on-time biomarker (for CRP, n = 74 [50%]; for FCP n = 58 [39.1%]). Both clinical and biochemical (either CRP or FCP) assessment was performed on time in 59% (n = 87), falling to 27% (n = 40) if considering completion of both biomarkers. In multivariate logistic regression, new starts were more likely to have clinical follow-up (aOR 2.90, 95% CI 1.08-7.78) and Hispanics less likely (aOR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.94). Older age (aOR per year 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99) and longer time from decision to start (aOR per day 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99) were associated with lower odds of biochemical follow-up. Non-infusion induction and corticosteroid use were associated with higher odds of biochemical follow-up in univariable but not multivariable analysis. Conclusion: In this prospective single-center study, 1/5 of patients did not undergo clinical assessment and over 1/3 lacked biochemical assessment within 16 weeks of actual start date for a new AT or new AT dosing. If low rates of early TTT assessments are confirmed with multicenter data, adherence to these assessments could prove to be a more impactful quality improvement focus than later targets such as endoscopy.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.