S1895 Risk of Colorectal and Hepatobiliary Cancers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease With and Without Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis

Introduction: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease frequently associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). While both conditions independently increase cancer risk, the comparative burden of cancer in patients with coexisting IBD and PSC (IBD-PSC), isolated IBD, and isolated PSC remains inadequately defined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX nationwide electronic health records database. Patients with IBD-PSC were compared to individuals with isolated IBD and isolated PSC. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance key baseline characteristics across groups. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for intestinal and extraintestinal malignancies across 3 pairwise comparisons: IBD-PSC vs isolated IBD, IBD-PSC vs isolated PSC, and isolated PSC vs isolated IBD. Results: There were 4,187 patients in both the IBD-PSC and isolated IBD groups after matching, with minimal residual confounding across demographic and clinical variables. Compared to isolated IBD, IBD-PSC was associated with significantly increased risks of colorectal cancer (aHR 4.01, 95% CI 2.79–5.75; P < 0.001), cholangiocarcinoma (aHR 27.54, 95% CI 15.05–50.38; P < 0.001), liver cancer (aHR 13.41, 95% CI 7.42–24.26; P < 0.001), pancreatic cancer (aHR 2.37, 95% CI 1.18–4.76; P = 0.013), and gallbladder cancer (aHR 36.26, 95% CI 4.94–266.23; P < 0.001). Compared to isolated PSC, IBD-PSC showed higher risks of colorectal cancer (aHR 5.72, 95% CI 3.17–10.31; P < 0.001) and gallbladder cancer (aHR 4.14, 95% CI 1.69–10.14; P = 0.001), while differences in liver (aHR 1.22, 95% CI 0.86–1.73; P = 0.268) and pancreatic cancer (aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.36–1.77; P = 0.583) were not significant. Isolated PSC was associated with a lower risk of rectal cancer compared to isolated IBD (aHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14–0.85; P = 0.015), but with higher risks of cholangiocarcinoma (aHR 14.82, 95% CI 7.78–28.25; P < 0.001), liver (aHR 5.47, 95% CI 3.24–9.23; P < 0.001), pancreatic (aHR 2.56, 95% CI 1.32–4.97; P = 0.004), and gallbladder cancer (aHR 9.52, 95% CI 1.21–75.16; P = 0.009). Conclusion: IBD-PSC is associated with substantially elevated risks of both intestinal and extraintestinal malignancies compared to isolated IBD or PSC. These findings highlight the synergistic oncogenic potential of coexisting IBD and PSC and underscore the need for tailored surveillance and early detection strategies in this high-risk population.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001135040.38895.9f
Primary Topic
Liver Diseases and Immunity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1895 Risk of Colorectal and Hepatobiliary Cancers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease With and Without Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Diseases and Immunity
article

S1895 Risk of Colorectal and Hepatobiliary Cancers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease With and Without Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease frequently associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). While both conditions independently increase cancer risk, the comparative burden of cancer in patients with coexisting IBD and PSC (IBD-PSC), isolated IBD, and isolated PSC remains inadequately defined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX nationwide electronic health records database. Patients with IBD-PSC were compared to individuals with isolated IBD and isolated PSC. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance key baseline characteristics across groups. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for intestinal and extraintestinal malignancies across 3 pairwise comparisons: IBD-PSC vs isolated IBD, IBD-PSC vs isolated PSC, and isolated PSC vs isolated IBD. Results: There were 4,187 patients in both the IBD-PSC and isolated IBD groups after matching, with minimal residual confounding across demographic and clinical variables. Compared to isolated IBD, IBD-PSC was associated with significantly increased risks of colorectal cancer (aHR 4.01, 95% CI 2.79–5.75; P < 0.001), cholangiocarcinoma (aHR 27.54, 95% CI 15.05–50.38; P < 0.001), liver cancer (aHR 13.41, 95% CI 7.42–24.26; P < 0.001), pancreatic cancer (aHR 2.37, 95% CI 1.18–4.76; P = 0.013), and gallbladder cancer (aHR 36.26, 95% CI 4.94–266.23; P < 0.001). Compared to isolated PSC, IBD-PSC showed higher risks of colorectal cancer (aHR 5.72, 95% CI 3.17–10.31; P < 0.001) and gallbladder cancer (aHR 4.14, 95% CI 1.69–10.14; P = 0.001), while differences in liver (aHR 1.22, 95% CI 0.86–1.73; P = 0.268) and pancreatic cancer (aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.36–1.77; P = 0.583) were not significant. Isolated PSC was associated with a lower risk of rectal cancer compared to isolated IBD (aHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14–0.85; P = 0.015), but with higher risks of cholangiocarcinoma (aHR 14.82, 95% CI 7.78–28.25; P < 0.001), liver (aHR 5.47, 95% CI 3.24–9.23; P < 0.001), pancreatic (aHR 2.56, 95% CI 1.32–4.97; P = 0.004), and gallbladder cancer (aHR 9.52, 95% CI 1.21–75.16; P = 0.009). Conclusion: IBD-PSC is associated with substantially elevated risks of both intestinal and extraintestinal malignancies compared to isolated IBD or PSC. These findings highlight the synergistic oncogenic potential of coexisting IBD and PSC and underscore the need for tailored surveillance and early detection strategies in this high-risk population.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Liver Diseases and Immunity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.