S2251 Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Pancreatic Divisum in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Pancreas divisum (PD) is the most common congenital anomaly of the pancreas. Although many PD patients are asymptomatic, some may experience recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), chronic pancreatitis (CP). Current evidence related to the utility of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in PD has been mostly limited to adults. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of ERCP for PD in the pediatric population. Methods: A systematic review of the literature from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, EMBASE and Scopus was conducted from inception to February 2025, for studies assessing the safety and efficacy of ERCP in pediatric PD. The primary outcomes of interest was clinical success. Secondary outcomes included clinical remission, technical success, and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using a random-effects model and expressed as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results: A total of 8 retrospective studies were included that reported on 252 patients. Males comprised 39.7% of participants, and the median age ranged from 9 to 14 years. Median follow-up post-ERCP ranged from 12 to 41 months. The pooled rate of clinical success was 83.7% (95% CI: 76.6%-90.8%; I2 = 42.53%). The pooled rate of clinical remission was 41.5% (95% CI: 18.6-64; I2 = 87.65%), while the pooled rate of technical success was 96.9% (95% CI: 94.3-99.6; I2 = 38.76%). The pooled rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 13.9% (95% CI: 7.9-20; I2 = 56.15%). In patients with PD presenting as recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), the pooled rate of clinical success was 81.6% (95% CI: 60.4-100; I2 = 91.3%), while in PD patients with chronic pancreatitis, the pooled rate of clinical success was 70.8% (95% CI: 58.3-83.3; I2 = 0%). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that ERCP is an effective and safe procedure in pediatric patients with PD, particularly when presenting with RAP. It also has a high rate of technical success, but further large-scale prospective studies are needed to better understand its role and safety in this population.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136464.54047.c9
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2251 Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Pancreatic Divisum in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
article

S2251 Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Pancreatic Divisum in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreas divisum (PD) is the most common congenital anomaly of the pancreas. Although many PD patients are asymptomatic, some may experience recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), chronic pancreatitis (CP). Current evidence related to the utility of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in PD has been mostly limited to adults. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of ERCP for PD in the pediatric population. Methods: A systematic review of the literature from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, EMBASE and Scopus was conducted from inception to February 2025, for studies assessing the safety and efficacy of ERCP in pediatric PD. The primary outcomes of interest was clinical success. Secondary outcomes included clinical remission, technical success, and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using a random-effects model and expressed as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results: A total of 8 retrospective studies were included that reported on 252 patients. Males comprised 39.7% of participants, and the median age ranged from 9 to 14 years. Median follow-up post-ERCP ranged from 12 to 41 months. The pooled rate of clinical success was 83.7% (95% CI: 76.6%-90.8%; I2 = 42.53%). The pooled rate of clinical remission was 41.5% (95% CI: 18.6-64; I2 = 87.65%), while the pooled rate of technical success was 96.9% (95% CI: 94.3-99.6; I2 = 38.76%). The pooled rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 13.9% (95% CI: 7.9-20; I2 = 56.15%). In patients with PD presenting as recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), the pooled rate of clinical success was 81.6% (95% CI: 60.4-100; I2 = 91.3%), while in PD patients with chronic pancreatitis, the pooled rate of clinical success was 70.8% (95% CI: 58.3-83.3; I2 = 0%). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that ERCP is an effective and safe procedure in pediatric patients with PD, particularly when presenting with RAP. It also has a high rate of technical success, but further large-scale prospective studies are needed to better understand its role and safety in this population.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

S2251 Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Pancreatic Divisum in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis · The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS