S2158 Safety and Efficacy of Per Oral Cholangioscopy (POC) in Index ERCP for Patients With Indeterminate Hilar Strictures

Introduction: Indeterminate hilar biliary strictures present a diagnostic and management challenge, with no established guidelines. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is used for sampling and management of these strictures, however, the low yield of ERCP may delay diagnosis and treatment. Per Oral Cholangioscopy (POC) offers direct visualization of the biliary tree and allows for targeted biopsies. However, concerns exist about the increased adverse events (AEs) with increased instrumentation during the index procedure. We aim to assess the safety, efficacy, and AE profile of POC used in index ERCP for the diagnosis and management of hilar strictures compared to standard ERCP. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent ERCP for indeterminate hilar strictures from 2018–2024 across a multicenter system. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on POC use during index ERCP. Primary outcome was time to diagnosis; secondary outcomes included time to treatment and AEs (cholangitis, sepsis, bacteremia, pancreatitis). Results: Among 117 patients meeting our inclusion criteria, 65 (55.5%) underwent ERCP with POC (case group), and 52 (44.4%) underwent standard ERCP (control group). No significant differences in age, gender, ethnicities, PSC, anticoagulation use, and Bismuth classifications were found. Stents were placed in 96.9% (case) vs 98.1% (control) (P = 1). Adverse events were not significantly different: pancreatitis (4.6% vs 0%), bleeding (3.1% vs 3.8%), cholangitis (1.5% vs 9.6%). In the case group, 87% had biliary sampling with brushing and cholangioscopy-directed biopsies, 6.5% with intraductal forceps, and 6.5% with brushings alone. In the control group, 71% had brushings alone and 29% had brushings along with intraductal forceps biopsy. Malignancy was diagnosed in 72.3% (case) vs 80.8% (control). Pathology confirmed malignancy in 58.5% (case) vs 34.6% (control) (P = 0.005). Diagnostic yield of index ERCP was 81% in the case group compared to 43% in the control group. Mean time to diagnosis was significantly shorter in the case group (8.82 ± 22.8 days vs 37.10 ± 100.7; P = 0.04). Time to treatment initiation trended shorter (72.17 ± 71.8 vs 130.77 ± 185.3 days; P = 0.06). Conclusion: For patients with indeterminate hilar biliary strictures, POC used during index ERCP increased diagnostic yield, shortened the time to establishment of diagnosis, and does not have increased adverse events compared to standard ERCP during index procedure.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136092.16046.5c
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2158 Safety and Efficacy of Per Oral Cholangioscopy (POC) in Index ERCP for Patients With Indeterminate Hilar Strictures

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

S2158 Safety and Efficacy of Per Oral Cholangioscopy (POC) in Index ERCP for Patients With Indeterminate Hilar Strictures

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Indeterminate hilar biliary strictures present a diagnostic and management challenge, with no established guidelines. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is used for sampling and management of these strictures, however, the low yield of ERCP may delay diagnosis and treatment. Per Oral Cholangioscopy (POC) offers direct visualization of the biliary tree and allows for targeted biopsies. However, concerns exist about the increased adverse events (AEs) with increased instrumentation during the index procedure. We aim to assess the safety, efficacy, and AE profile of POC used in index ERCP for the diagnosis and management of hilar strictures compared to standard ERCP. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent ERCP for indeterminate hilar strictures from 2018–2024 across a multicenter system. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on POC use during index ERCP. Primary outcome was time to diagnosis; secondary outcomes included time to treatment and AEs (cholangitis, sepsis, bacteremia, pancreatitis). Results: Among 117 patients meeting our inclusion criteria, 65 (55.5%) underwent ERCP with POC (case group), and 52 (44.4%) underwent standard ERCP (control group). No significant differences in age, gender, ethnicities, PSC, anticoagulation use, and Bismuth classifications were found. Stents were placed in 96.9% (case) vs 98.1% (control) (P = 1). Adverse events were not significantly different: pancreatitis (4.6% vs 0%), bleeding (3.1% vs 3.8%), cholangitis (1.5% vs 9.6%). In the case group, 87% had biliary sampling with brushing and cholangioscopy-directed biopsies, 6.5% with intraductal forceps, and 6.5% with brushings alone. In the control group, 71% had brushings alone and 29% had brushings along with intraductal forceps biopsy. Malignancy was diagnosed in 72.3% (case) vs 80.8% (control). Pathology confirmed malignancy in 58.5% (case) vs 34.6% (control) (P = 0.005). Diagnostic yield of index ERCP was 81% in the case group compared to 43% in the control group. Mean time to diagnosis was significantly shorter in the case group (8.82 ± 22.8 days vs 37.10 ± 100.7; P = 0.04). Time to treatment initiation trended shorter (72.17 ± 71.8 vs 130.77 ± 185.3 days; P = 0.06). Conclusion: For patients with indeterminate hilar biliary strictures, POC used during index ERCP increased diagnostic yield, shortened the time to establishment of diagnosis, and does not have increased adverse events compared to standard ERCP during index procedure.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.