S2013 Patient Perspectives on the Use of Intestinal Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Disorders of the Pouch After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

Introduction: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is increasingly utilized for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care. However, there is a paucity of data on the use of IUS specifically for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). The aim of this study was to evaluate patients’ experiences with IUS for complications of the pouch. Methods: A 10-question survey was electronically sent via the patient portal to adults with an IPAA at an academic IBD center who had both an IUS (transabdominal and transperineal) and pouchoscopy performed within the same month for evaluation of their J-pouch (7/1/2024 - 4/30/2025). The survey questions utilized both multiple choice format and 5-point Likert scale to assess attitudes about IUS. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and those without completion of all IPAA stages were excluded. Results: A total of 98.2% (54/55) patients completed the survey. Regarding quality of life, 72.2% reported they were very satisfied or satisfied with their J-pouch. Only 3.7% had an IUS performed prior to this study for their IBD care. Most patients strongly agreed or agreed the following were potential benefits of IUS compared to conventional pouchoscopy: 92.6% less invasive test, 87.0% absence of bowel preparation required, and 92.6% absence of radiation and/or need for oral contrast. Most (83.3%) reported feeling comfortable with their IBD provider ordering and/or performing an IUS of their pouch. A qualitative analysis was performed with 3 major themes identified: i) positive perception of patients towards the use of IUS for assessing pouch complications, ii) preference for less invasive testing requiring less preparation, and iii) uncertainty about the accuracy of IUS compared to pouchoscopy with biopsies for their IPAA care. Notably, 64.8% were very interested or interested in learning more about IUS and 83.3% were very likely or likely willing to have another IUS performed for evaluation of their pouch. Conclusion: Most patients with UC and an IPAA have favorable perceptions regarding the potential use of IUS in their care. Additionally, the majority are interested in learning more about IUS as a tool for evaluation of disorders of the pouch.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001135512.52521.a5
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2013 Patient Perspectives on the Use of Intestinal Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Disorders of the Pouch After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S2013 Patient Perspectives on the Use of Intestinal Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Disorders of the Pouch After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is increasingly utilized for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care. However, there is a paucity of data on the use of IUS specifically for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). The aim of this study was to evaluate patients’ experiences with IUS for complications of the pouch. Methods: A 10-question survey was electronically sent via the patient portal to adults with an IPAA at an academic IBD center who had both an IUS (transabdominal and transperineal) and pouchoscopy performed within the same month for evaluation of their J-pouch (7/1/2024 - 4/30/2025). The survey questions utilized both multiple choice format and 5-point Likert scale to assess attitudes about IUS. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and those without completion of all IPAA stages were excluded. Results: A total of 98.2% (54/55) patients completed the survey. Regarding quality of life, 72.2% reported they were very satisfied or satisfied with their J-pouch. Only 3.7% had an IUS performed prior to this study for their IBD care. Most patients strongly agreed or agreed the following were potential benefits of IUS compared to conventional pouchoscopy: 92.6% less invasive test, 87.0% absence of bowel preparation required, and 92.6% absence of radiation and/or need for oral contrast. Most (83.3%) reported feeling comfortable with their IBD provider ordering and/or performing an IUS of their pouch. A qualitative analysis was performed with 3 major themes identified: i) positive perception of patients towards the use of IUS for assessing pouch complications, ii) preference for less invasive testing requiring less preparation, and iii) uncertainty about the accuracy of IUS compared to pouchoscopy with biopsies for their IPAA care. Notably, 64.8% were very interested or interested in learning more about IUS and 83.3% were very likely or likely willing to have another IUS performed for evaluation of their pouch. Conclusion: Most patients with UC and an IPAA have favorable perceptions regarding the potential use of IUS in their care. Additionally, the majority are interested in learning more about IUS as a tool for evaluation of disorders of the pouch.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.