S2079 KRAS Mutations Set the Stage for Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis-Induced Sepsis in Pancreatic and Colorectal Cancer

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer ranks as the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide; colorectal cancer is the second deadliest globally. KRAS mutations occur in ∼80% of all pancreatic cancers and in 45% of colorectal cancers. These mutations, especially the KRAS G12D variant, cause a heightened inflammatory state leading to susceptibility to Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF), a commensal bacterium that produces a toxin that disrupts epithelial tight junctions and drives inflammation. In combination, these factors may increase the risk of septic shock. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing de-identified patient data from the TriNetX platform, a comprehensive electronic health records system consisting of 143 healthcare systems from 18 countries and over 163 million patients' records. In this study, we compare the risk of sepsis for patients with positive blood cultures for ETBF and KRAS-associated pancreatic cancer (Cohort A) versus KRAS-associated colorectal cancer (Cohort B). Additionally, we analyzed post-sepsis outcomes, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Results: For Cohort A (n = 5,242), the risk of sepsis was 2.1% (n = 109) while the risk for Cohort B (n = 5,291) was 1.4% (n = 75) (P = 0.01), corresponding to a risk ratio of 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.96). Post-sepsis, Cohort A had a non-significant increased incidence of DVT compared to Cohort B (15.6% vs 9.6%, OR 1.7, CI 0.7-4.4; P = 0.2). Similarly, there was a non-significant increase in PE in Cohort A (17.2% vs 10.6%, odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 0.7-4.5; P = 0.2). Conclusion: This study showed a nearly 50% higher risk of sepsis in the KRAS-associated pancreatic cancer compared to KRAS-associated CRC. While the pancreatic cohort did not reach significance for DVT and PE, the magnitude of these measures, ∼75% increase in both, highlights a potentially meaningful trend. These differences may reflect a greater inflammatory state in pancreatic cancer, driven in part by KRAS G12D-mediated activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1B. Increased microbial translocation and compromised gut barrier integrity may also exacerbate systemic dissemination of ETBF. Conversely, lower sepsis incidence in colorectal cancer could show greater mucosal immunity, a more balanced microbial ecosystem composition and less intensive chemotherapy. Clinically, these results highlight the need for increased sepsis surveillance in KRAS pancreatic cancer, especially for those with evidence of gut barrier disruption or ETBF colonization.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001135776.18552.c3
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2079 KRAS Mutations Set the Stage for Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis-Induced Sepsis in Pancreatic and Colorectal Cancer

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

S2079 KRAS Mutations Set the Stage for Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis-Induced Sepsis in Pancreatic and Colorectal Cancer

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer ranks as the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide; colorectal cancer is the second deadliest globally. KRAS mutations occur in ∼80% of all pancreatic cancers and in 45% of colorectal cancers. These mutations, especially the KRAS G12D variant, cause a heightened inflammatory state leading to susceptibility to Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF), a commensal bacterium that produces a toxin that disrupts epithelial tight junctions and drives inflammation. In combination, these factors may increase the risk of septic shock. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing de-identified patient data from the TriNetX platform, a comprehensive electronic health records system consisting of 143 healthcare systems from 18 countries and over 163 million patients' records. In this study, we compare the risk of sepsis for patients with positive blood cultures for ETBF and KRAS-associated pancreatic cancer (Cohort A) versus KRAS-associated colorectal cancer (Cohort B). Additionally, we analyzed post-sepsis outcomes, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Results: For Cohort A (n = 5,242), the risk of sepsis was 2.1% (n = 109) while the risk for Cohort B (n = 5,291) was 1.4% (n = 75) (P = 0.01), corresponding to a risk ratio of 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.96). Post-sepsis, Cohort A had a non-significant increased incidence of DVT compared to Cohort B (15.6% vs 9.6%, OR 1.7, CI 0.7-4.4; P = 0.2). Similarly, there was a non-significant increase in PE in Cohort A (17.2% vs 10.6%, odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 0.7-4.5; P = 0.2). Conclusion: This study showed a nearly 50% higher risk of sepsis in the KRAS-associated pancreatic cancer compared to KRAS-associated CRC. While the pancreatic cohort did not reach significance for DVT and PE, the magnitude of these measures, ∼75% increase in both, highlights a potentially meaningful trend. These differences may reflect a greater inflammatory state in pancreatic cancer, driven in part by KRAS G12D-mediated activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1B. Increased microbial translocation and compromised gut barrier integrity may also exacerbate systemic dissemination of ETBF. Conversely, lower sepsis incidence in colorectal cancer could show greater mucosal immunity, a more balanced microbial ecosystem composition and less intensive chemotherapy. Clinically, these results highlight the need for increased sepsis surveillance in KRAS pancreatic cancer, especially for those with evidence of gut barrier disruption or ETBF colonization.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.