S2172 Re-Evaluating the Optimal Timing of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Removal in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Evidence From a Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have transformed endoscopic management of walled-off necrosis (WON) and large pseudocysts by permitting wide, stable cyst-gastrostomy and direct necrosectomy. Current societies advise retrieval at 3–5 weeks, yet these statements are based on limited data and conflicting single-center series. Methods: All adults who underwent trans-gastric Hot AXIOS placement for WON or symptomatic pseudocyst between January 2017 and March 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. The composite 30-day adverse-event (AE) endpoint captured any post-removal bleeding, migration/burial, new or recurrent fluid collection >4 cm, unplanned readmission or death. Clinical success required radiographic resolution without further intervention. Categorical outcomes were compared with Fisher’s exact test; absolute risk differences (RD) carry 95% CIs. Results: Forty-nine patients met inclusion (median age 57 yr, interquartile range 48–66; 65% man). Twenty-7 had WON and 22 pseudocysts. Twelve stents were removed early, 17 in the standard window and 20 after >28 d, yielding median dwell times of 11, 21 and 47 d. Composite 30-day AEs occurred in 2/12 (16.7%) early, 9/17 (52.9%) standard and 4/20 (20%) delayed removals; RD standard–early = +36.3% (95% 4.5–68.0) and RD standard–delayed = +32.9% (3.4–62.4), whereas early and delayed differed less (–3.3%, –30.8–24.1). Bleeding was uncommon (8%) and evenly distributed, but unplanned readmissions were highest with standard timing (35.3% vs 8.3% early, 15.0% delayed). Clinical success was achieved in 10/11 early (90.9%), 12/15 standard (80.0%) and 17/17 delayed cases (100%). Multivariable analysis in 44 patients retained a non-significant but directionally consistent effect for standard removal (OR 4.95 vs early, 95% 0.67–36.3); no demographic or procedural covariate independently predicted AE. Subgroup analysis reinforced the pattern: in WON, AEs were 14.3% early, 54.5% standard and 33.3% delayed, while pseudocyst rates remained ≤25% irrespective of timing. Conclusion: In patients with large pseudocysts and WONs, removal of LAMS early (<14 days) in showed lowest AE rates when compared to “standard” (14-28 days) and delayed (>28 days) without compromising clinical success. Additionally, delayed removals also had lower AE rates when compared to standard window of removal. These findings challenge the current LAMS removal timing and suggest that selected patients may safely undergo earlier stent removal with lower AEs. Prospective validation is warranted.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136148.47865.a4
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2172 Re-Evaluating the Optimal Timing of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Removal in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Evidence From a Retrospective Cohort Study

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
article

S2172 Re-Evaluating the Optimal Timing of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Removal in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Evidence From a Retrospective Cohort Study

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have transformed endoscopic management of walled-off necrosis (WON) and large pseudocysts by permitting wide, stable cyst-gastrostomy and direct necrosectomy. Current societies advise retrieval at 3–5 weeks, yet these statements are based on limited data and conflicting single-center series. Methods: All adults who underwent trans-gastric Hot AXIOS placement for WON or symptomatic pseudocyst between January 2017 and March 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. The composite 30-day adverse-event (AE) endpoint captured any post-removal bleeding, migration/burial, new or recurrent fluid collection >4 cm, unplanned readmission or death. Clinical success required radiographic resolution without further intervention. Categorical outcomes were compared with Fisher’s exact test; absolute risk differences (RD) carry 95% CIs. Results: Forty-nine patients met inclusion (median age 57 yr, interquartile range 48–66; 65% man). Twenty-7 had WON and 22 pseudocysts. Twelve stents were removed early, 17 in the standard window and 20 after >28 d, yielding median dwell times of 11, 21 and 47 d. Composite 30-day AEs occurred in 2/12 (16.7%) early, 9/17 (52.9%) standard and 4/20 (20%) delayed removals; RD standard–early = +36.3% (95% 4.5–68.0) and RD standard–delayed = +32.9% (3.4–62.4), whereas early and delayed differed less (–3.3%, –30.8–24.1). Bleeding was uncommon (8%) and evenly distributed, but unplanned readmissions were highest with standard timing (35.3% vs 8.3% early, 15.0% delayed). Clinical success was achieved in 10/11 early (90.9%), 12/15 standard (80.0%) and 17/17 delayed cases (100%). Multivariable analysis in 44 patients retained a non-significant but directionally consistent effect for standard removal (OR 4.95 vs early, 95% 0.67–36.3); no demographic or procedural covariate independently predicted AE. Subgroup analysis reinforced the pattern: in WON, AEs were 14.3% early, 54.5% standard and 33.3% delayed, while pseudocyst rates remained ≤25% irrespective of timing. Conclusion: In patients with large pseudocysts and WONs, removal of LAMS early (<14 days) in showed lowest AE rates when compared to “standard” (14-28 days) and delayed (>28 days) without compromising clinical success. Additionally, delayed removals also had lower AE rates when compared to standard window of removal. These findings challenge the current LAMS removal timing and suggest that selected patients may safely undergo earlier stent removal with lower AEs. Prospective validation is warranted.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.