S1801 Real-World Comparison of Infliximab and Adalimumab in Achieving Biomarker-Based Remission in Ulcerative Colitis

Introduction: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition that significantly impairs quality of life. Biologic therapies such as Infliximab and Adalimumab, which target tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), have shown efficacy in controlling inflammation. Limited data exists that compares their efficacy in achieving biomarker-based remission. This study uses real-world data to provide a comprehensive comparison of Infliximab and Adalimumab in remission induction in UC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX data from 93 healthcare organizations. A total of 7,084 adult patients (≥18 years) with UC treated with Infliximab or Adalimumab between 2018 and 2023 were initially identified. Propensity score matching was performed to balance age, sex, race/ethnicity, disease severity, and comorbidities, resulting in 2,647 matched UC patients per treatment group (total n = 5,294). The primary outcome was biomarker-based remission, defined as serum C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤5 mg/L or fecal calprotectin ≤150 µg/g, and assessed at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years. Induction of remission rates and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were reported for the UC cohort. Results: Infliximab demonstrated consistently higher remission rates than Adalimumab across all time points (P < 0.001). At 6 months, remission was achieved more frequently with Infliximab in UC (35.3% vs 25.4%). This pattern was held at 1 year (46.3% vs 37.1%), 3 years (61.9% vs 55.0%), and 5 years (65.9% vs 60.0%). Hazard ratios (HR) were directionally standardized to reflect Infliximab over Adalimumab (Infliximab/Adalimumab). Therefore, HR >1 indicates faster remission with Infliximab. Infliximab was associated with a significantly shorter time to remission across all time points in UC (all HRs >1, P < 0.001). Median time to remission was also consistently shorter with Infliximab compared to Adalimumab across the UC group. This supports the hazard ratio findings and further shows a faster induction of remission with Infliximab. Conclusion: Infliximab achieves more frequent and faster remission rates for UC at all time points. This may help guide biologic therapy selection and early treatment decisions in UC.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001134664.24828.14
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1801 Real-World Comparison of Infliximab and Adalimumab in Achieving Biomarker-Based Remission in Ulcerative Colitis

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1801 Real-World Comparison of Infliximab and Adalimumab in Achieving Biomarker-Based Remission in Ulcerative Colitis

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition that significantly impairs quality of life. Biologic therapies such as Infliximab and Adalimumab, which target tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), have shown efficacy in controlling inflammation. Limited data exists that compares their efficacy in achieving biomarker-based remission. This study uses real-world data to provide a comprehensive comparison of Infliximab and Adalimumab in remission induction in UC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX data from 93 healthcare organizations. A total of 7,084 adult patients (≥18 years) with UC treated with Infliximab or Adalimumab between 2018 and 2023 were initially identified. Propensity score matching was performed to balance age, sex, race/ethnicity, disease severity, and comorbidities, resulting in 2,647 matched UC patients per treatment group (total n = 5,294). The primary outcome was biomarker-based remission, defined as serum C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤5 mg/L or fecal calprotectin ≤150 µg/g, and assessed at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years. Induction of remission rates and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were reported for the UC cohort. Results: Infliximab demonstrated consistently higher remission rates than Adalimumab across all time points (P < 0.001). At 6 months, remission was achieved more frequently with Infliximab in UC (35.3% vs 25.4%). This pattern was held at 1 year (46.3% vs 37.1%), 3 years (61.9% vs 55.0%), and 5 years (65.9% vs 60.0%). Hazard ratios (HR) were directionally standardized to reflect Infliximab over Adalimumab (Infliximab/Adalimumab). Therefore, HR >1 indicates faster remission with Infliximab. Infliximab was associated with a significantly shorter time to remission across all time points in UC (all HRs >1, P < 0.001). Median time to remission was also consistently shorter with Infliximab compared to Adalimumab across the UC group. This supports the hazard ratio findings and further shows a faster induction of remission with Infliximab. Conclusion: Infliximab achieves more frequent and faster remission rates for UC at all time points. This may help guide biologic therapy selection and early treatment decisions in UC.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.