S1872 Overall and Comparative Risk of Shingles With Advanced Therapies in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Introduction: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing the risk of shingles with advanced therapies in patients with Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: Using an administrative claims database, we identified patients with IBD who initiated treatment with either tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) antagonists (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab and certolizumab pegol), anti-integrin agents (vedolizumab), anti-interleukin (IL)-12/23p40 or anti-IL-23p19 agents (ustekinumab, risankizumab, mirikizumab, collectively labeled anti-interleukins), or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (tofacitinib, upadacitinib) between 2016 and 2023, and had insurance coverage for at least 1 y before and after treatment initiation. We assessed the incidence rate (IR per 100 person-year [PY]) of shingles (overall and complicated, including post herpetic neuralgia ocular and neurologic involvement) and compared risks using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Propensity scores were estimated through generalized boosted models incorporating demographics, comorbidities, healthcare utilization, and prior/concomitant IBD therapies. Weighted Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: We included 21,564 patients with IBD (mean age range, 45-49 years; 51-53% females; 6% with zoster vaccination) followed over 27 months. The incidence of shingles and complicated shingles varied with difference advanced therapies: TNF antagonists (n = 9,385; IR of shingles/complicated shingles per 100-py, 1.00/0.30), anti-integrin agents (n = 5,881; IR, 1.38/0.43), anti-interleukins (n = 5,445; IR, 1.24/0.45) and JAK inhibitors (n = 853; IR, 3.33/0.88). After adjusting for confounding variables using IPTW, JAK inhibitors were associated with higher risks of shingles compared with TNF antagonists (HR, 2.72 [95% CI, 1.67-4.43]), anti-integrin agents (HR, 2.41 [1.51-3.84]) and anti-IL 12/23p40 agents or anti-IL-23p19 (HR, 2.45 [1.53-3.95]). Similar trends were observed for risk of complicated shingles. No differences were observed in the risk of shingles between TNF antagonists, anti-integrins and anti-interleukins. Conclusion: In this large real-world cohort of patients with IBD, JAK inhibitors were associated with higher risks of overall shingles compared to other advanced therapies. No differences were observed in the risk of shingles with other advanced therapies, with overall incidence ranging from 1.0-1.4 per 100-py.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001134948.12240.7d
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1872 Overall and Comparative Risk of Shingles With Advanced Therapies in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1872 Overall and Comparative Risk of Shingles With Advanced Therapies in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

article en

Abstract

Introduction: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing the risk of shingles with advanced therapies in patients with Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: Using an administrative claims database, we identified patients with IBD who initiated treatment with either tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) antagonists (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab and certolizumab pegol), anti-integrin agents (vedolizumab), anti-interleukin (IL)-12/23p40 or anti-IL-23p19 agents (ustekinumab, risankizumab, mirikizumab, collectively labeled anti-interleukins), or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (tofacitinib, upadacitinib) between 2016 and 2023, and had insurance coverage for at least 1 y before and after treatment initiation. We assessed the incidence rate (IR per 100 person-year [PY]) of shingles (overall and complicated, including post herpetic neuralgia ocular and neurologic involvement) and compared risks using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Propensity scores were estimated through generalized boosted models incorporating demographics, comorbidities, healthcare utilization, and prior/concomitant IBD therapies. Weighted Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: We included 21,564 patients with IBD (mean age range, 45-49 years; 51-53% females; 6% with zoster vaccination) followed over 27 months. The incidence of shingles and complicated shingles varied with difference advanced therapies: TNF antagonists (n = 9,385; IR of shingles/complicated shingles per 100-py, 1.00/0.30), anti-integrin agents (n = 5,881; IR, 1.38/0.43), anti-interleukins (n = 5,445; IR, 1.24/0.45) and JAK inhibitors (n = 853; IR, 3.33/0.88). After adjusting for confounding variables using IPTW, JAK inhibitors were associated with higher risks of shingles compared with TNF antagonists (HR, 2.72 [95% CI, 1.67-4.43]), anti-integrin agents (HR, 2.41 [1.51-3.84]) and anti-IL 12/23p40 agents or anti-IL-23p19 (HR, 2.45 [1.53-3.95]). Similar trends were observed for risk of complicated shingles. No differences were observed in the risk of shingles between TNF antagonists, anti-integrins and anti-interleukins. Conclusion: In this large real-world cohort of patients with IBD, JAK inhibitors were associated with higher risks of overall shingles compared to other advanced therapies. No differences were observed in the risk of shingles with other advanced therapies, with overall incidence ranging from 1.0-1.4 per 100-py.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.