S1888 JAK Inhibitors for Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety

Introduction: Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory condition with limited effective treatment options. Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors offer a novel approach but lack direct comparative data in CD. This study conducts a dose-dependent network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare various JAK inhibitors. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to February 17, 2025. RCTs assessing the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of adults with Crohn’s disease were included. Dose-response Bayesian network meta-analysis utilizing an Emax model was conducted using “MBNMA” package in R, and treatment effects were estimated using risk ratios (RRs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2. Results: Nine RCTs (n = 4838) evaluated Upadacitinib (UPA), Tofacitinib (TOFA), and Filgotinib (FIL) at multiple doses. Upadacitinib 45 mg once daily demonstrated the greatest benefit in achieving CDAI (Crohn’s Disease Activity Index) remission compared to placebo (RR = 1.8, 95% CrI [1.1–3.0]). SUCRA rankings showed that UPA ranked highest for overall clinical and CDAI remission. Meta-regression revealed a statistically significant association between higher doses and increased remission rates (P = 0.041). According to dose–response modeling, UPA had both a higher Emax and a lower ED50, indicating greater efficacy and potency compared to TOFA and FIL. Serious adverse events (AEs) were significantly more common with JAK inhibitors compared to placebo (RR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.15–2.25; P = 0.0082). Specific events such as sepsis, cardiovascular AEs, and elevated liver enzymes occurred more frequently in the JAK inhibitor group (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in the risk of overall AEs among individual JAK inhibitors assessed (P = 0.0008), with UPA showing higher AE rates compared to placebo (RR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.07–1.33). Additionally, UPA significantly increased the risk of serious infections compared to placebo (RR = 5.39; 95% CI: 2.98–9.74). Conclusion: JAK inhibitors significantly improved clinical outcomes in Crohn’s disease patients. UPA demonstrated the most consistent efficacy across trials, characterized by a favorable pharmacodynamic profile compared to TOFA and FIL. However, these therapeutic gains of UPA were accompanied by a higher incidence of adverse events, particularly serious infections.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001135012.43264.be
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1888 JAK Inhibitors for Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1888 JAK Inhibitors for Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory condition with limited effective treatment options. Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors offer a novel approach but lack direct comparative data in CD. This study conducts a dose-dependent network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare various JAK inhibitors. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to February 17, 2025. RCTs assessing the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of adults with Crohn’s disease were included. Dose-response Bayesian network meta-analysis utilizing an Emax model was conducted using “MBNMA” package in R, and treatment effects were estimated using risk ratios (RRs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2. Results: Nine RCTs (n = 4838) evaluated Upadacitinib (UPA), Tofacitinib (TOFA), and Filgotinib (FIL) at multiple doses. Upadacitinib 45 mg once daily demonstrated the greatest benefit in achieving CDAI (Crohn’s Disease Activity Index) remission compared to placebo (RR = 1.8, 95% CrI [1.1–3.0]). SUCRA rankings showed that UPA ranked highest for overall clinical and CDAI remission. Meta-regression revealed a statistically significant association between higher doses and increased remission rates (P = 0.041). According to dose–response modeling, UPA had both a higher Emax and a lower ED50, indicating greater efficacy and potency compared to TOFA and FIL. Serious adverse events (AEs) were significantly more common with JAK inhibitors compared to placebo (RR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.15–2.25; P = 0.0082). Specific events such as sepsis, cardiovascular AEs, and elevated liver enzymes occurred more frequently in the JAK inhibitor group (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in the risk of overall AEs among individual JAK inhibitors assessed (P = 0.0008), with UPA showing higher AE rates compared to placebo (RR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.07–1.33). Additionally, UPA significantly increased the risk of serious infections compared to placebo (RR = 5.39; 95% CI: 2.98–9.74). Conclusion: JAK inhibitors significantly improved clinical outcomes in Crohn’s disease patients. UPA demonstrated the most consistent efficacy across trials, characterized by a favorable pharmacodynamic profile compared to TOFA and FIL. However, these therapeutic gains of UPA were accompanied by a higher incidence of adverse events, particularly serious infections.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.