S2258 Safety and Efficacy of Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection-Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Large Polyps at the Ileocecal Valve: A Retrospective Single Center Study

Introduction: Endoscopic resection of polyps at the ileocecal valve (ICV) can be challenging due to anatomic complexity including polyp extension into the terminal ileum and polyp flatness. Hybrid endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technique that allows for initial submucosal dissection of polyp margins prior to EMR, allowing for reduced recurrence rates while avoiding potential adverse events of ESD. In this study, we report a case series of 10 adult patients with ICV polyps who underwent successful endoscopic resection utilizing hybrid ESD-EMR and outline the safety and efficacy of the technique. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent endoscopic resection of ICV polyps at University of Minnesota Medical Center from 2022 to 2025. Patients who underwent hybrid ESD-EMR technique were included in our study. Data on polyp characteristics and histopathology, procedural outcomes, interventions used for bleeding prophylaxis, adverse event rates, recurrence rates and surgical referral were obtained. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: Ten patients with ICV polyps who underwent hybrid ESD-EMR were included. Study population consisted of 40% men with a mean age of 61.6 years. The median polyp size was 20 mm (10-50 mm). Technical success was 100%. Seventy percent of lesions were resected in piecemeal fashion and 30% using en bloc resection. Interventions for bleeding prophylaxis were variable: hemostatic clips for 50% of cases, hemostatic powder for 20%, and no intervention for the remaining 30% of cases. Final histopathology was high grade dysplasia in 20% of cases. Adverse events were noted in 20% of cases, consisting of one patient with post-polypectomy syndrome (ASGE grade I) and one patient with early bleeding (ASGE grade IIIa). One patient who underwent piecemeal resection had residual disease on 6-month follow-up and underwent cold snare resection followed by hot avulsion. None of the patients required surgical referral after endoscopic resection. Conclusion: Our case series demonstrates 100% technical success with a minimal risk of disease recurrence or adverse events. We conclude that hybrid ESD-EMR may be a safe and effective resection strategy for management of large polyps at the ICV. Challenges remain with prevention of delayed bleeding as prophylactic clip closure is often difficult and can potentially cause stenosis at the ICV.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136492.63017.86
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2258 Safety and Efficacy of Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection-Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Large Polyps at the Ileocecal Valve: A Retrospective Single Center Study

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

S2258 Safety and Efficacy of Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection-Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Large Polyps at the Ileocecal Valve: A Retrospective Single Center Study

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic resection of polyps at the ileocecal valve (ICV) can be challenging due to anatomic complexity including polyp extension into the terminal ileum and polyp flatness. Hybrid endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technique that allows for initial submucosal dissection of polyp margins prior to EMR, allowing for reduced recurrence rates while avoiding potential adverse events of ESD. In this study, we report a case series of 10 adult patients with ICV polyps who underwent successful endoscopic resection utilizing hybrid ESD-EMR and outline the safety and efficacy of the technique. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent endoscopic resection of ICV polyps at University of Minnesota Medical Center from 2022 to 2025. Patients who underwent hybrid ESD-EMR technique were included in our study. Data on polyp characteristics and histopathology, procedural outcomes, interventions used for bleeding prophylaxis, adverse event rates, recurrence rates and surgical referral were obtained. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: Ten patients with ICV polyps who underwent hybrid ESD-EMR were included. Study population consisted of 40% men with a mean age of 61.6 years. The median polyp size was 20 mm (10-50 mm). Technical success was 100%. Seventy percent of lesions were resected in piecemeal fashion and 30% using en bloc resection. Interventions for bleeding prophylaxis were variable: hemostatic clips for 50% of cases, hemostatic powder for 20%, and no intervention for the remaining 30% of cases. Final histopathology was high grade dysplasia in 20% of cases. Adverse events were noted in 20% of cases, consisting of one patient with post-polypectomy syndrome (ASGE grade I) and one patient with early bleeding (ASGE grade IIIa). One patient who underwent piecemeal resection had residual disease on 6-month follow-up and underwent cold snare resection followed by hot avulsion. None of the patients required surgical referral after endoscopic resection. Conclusion: Our case series demonstrates 100% technical success with a minimal risk of disease recurrence or adverse events. We conclude that hybrid ESD-EMR may be a safe and effective resection strategy for management of large polyps at the ICV. Challenges remain with prevention of delayed bleeding as prophylactic clip closure is often difficult and can potentially cause stenosis at the ICV.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.