S2188 Efficacy and Safety of Esophageal Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (E-POEM) in Patients With History of Bariatric Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Introduction: Achalasia affects up to 7.2% of post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) patients, often years later and confirmed by manometry. Altered anatomy creates distinct esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy (E-POEM) challenges: RYGB distorts the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), requiring tunnel extension into the pouch or Roux limb, while SG yields a narrow, scarred sleeve that can limit distal myotomy. Small series report technical success of 97.5–100% and clinical relief of 67–100% with tailored modifications, myotomy orientation, careful tunneling, and adjusted lengths. However, limited cohorts, follow-up, and inconsistent outcome definitions necessitate larger multicenter studies. Methods: Between 2020 and 2024, we retrospectively reviewed adult achalasia patients with prior RYGB or SG who underwent E-POEM at 6 tertiary U.S. centers. Patient demographics, procedural details, and follow-up outcomes were collected. The primary endpoint was clinical success defined as Eckardt score ≤3 at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included technical success (completion of planned myotomy) and adverse events. Results: A total of 22 patients (mean age: 59.9 ± 10.7 years; 16 woman) with achalasia and a history of bariatric surgery underwent E-POEM with median follow up of 12 months. Thirteen patients (59%) had undergone RYGB, 5 (22.7%) sleeve gastrectomy and one gastric banding. All procedures were technically successful, with posterior myotomy performed in 18 patients. The mean ± SD myotomy length was 10.81 ± 5.91 cm, extending an average of 2.5 cm beyond the GEJ. The mean procedure duration was 50.5 minutes, and the average hospital stay was 1.36 days. Post-procedure complications included chest pain in 2 patients and regurgitation in 2 patients. The post-procedure Eckardt score was available for 19 patients, with clinical success achieved in 17 (89.4%). Conclusion: E-POEM is both feasible and effective in achalasia patients with prior bariatric surgery, supporting its use as first-line therapy in this group. Limitations include retrospective design, small cohorts, and inconsistent outcome measures. Prospective multicenter trials with standardized endpoints are needed.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136212.61166.4d
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2188 Efficacy and Safety of Esophageal Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (E-POEM) in Patients With History of Bariatric Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

S2188 Efficacy and Safety of Esophageal Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (E-POEM) in Patients With History of Bariatric Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Achalasia affects up to 7.2% of post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) patients, often years later and confirmed by manometry. Altered anatomy creates distinct esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy (E-POEM) challenges: RYGB distorts the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), requiring tunnel extension into the pouch or Roux limb, while SG yields a narrow, scarred sleeve that can limit distal myotomy. Small series report technical success of 97.5–100% and clinical relief of 67–100% with tailored modifications, myotomy orientation, careful tunneling, and adjusted lengths. However, limited cohorts, follow-up, and inconsistent outcome definitions necessitate larger multicenter studies. Methods: Between 2020 and 2024, we retrospectively reviewed adult achalasia patients with prior RYGB or SG who underwent E-POEM at 6 tertiary U.S. centers. Patient demographics, procedural details, and follow-up outcomes were collected. The primary endpoint was clinical success defined as Eckardt score ≤3 at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included technical success (completion of planned myotomy) and adverse events. Results: A total of 22 patients (mean age: 59.9 ± 10.7 years; 16 woman) with achalasia and a history of bariatric surgery underwent E-POEM with median follow up of 12 months. Thirteen patients (59%) had undergone RYGB, 5 (22.7%) sleeve gastrectomy and one gastric banding. All procedures were technically successful, with posterior myotomy performed in 18 patients. The mean ± SD myotomy length was 10.81 ± 5.91 cm, extending an average of 2.5 cm beyond the GEJ. The mean procedure duration was 50.5 minutes, and the average hospital stay was 1.36 days. Post-procedure complications included chest pain in 2 patients and regurgitation in 2 patients. The post-procedure Eckardt score was available for 19 patients, with clinical success achieved in 17 (89.4%). Conclusion: E-POEM is both feasible and effective in achalasia patients with prior bariatric surgery, supporting its use as first-line therapy in this group. Limitations include retrospective design, small cohorts, and inconsistent outcome measures. Prospective multicenter trials with standardized endpoints are needed.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

S2188 Efficacy and Safety of Esophageal Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (E-POEM) in Patients With History of Bariatric Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study · The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS