Minimizing the flow resistance of an exhaust system by shaping the exhaust hood with a discrete adjoint method

To reduce the flow resistance of an exhaust system, the method of applying individually shape-optimized exhaust hoods, namely mass-production design, is feasible. However, the combined effect of multiple exhaust hoods in an exhaust system may not be optimal in reducing the flow resistance. This investigation thus firstly validated the shape optimization of an individual exhaust hood by a discrete adjoint method to reduce the flow resistance. The design variables were the coordinates of wall boundaries of the exhaust hood. The validation used measured data from a small-scale experiment. This study then applied the validated discrete adjoint method to conduct customized design through the shape optimization of multiple exhaust hoods simultaneously in the exhaust system. The flow resistance under customized design was compared with the method of mass-production design. The results revealed that the customized design led to different shapes of individual exhaust hoods and they were different from the shape of the individually optimized exhaust hood. The flow resistance of the exhaust system under customized design and mass-production design was reduced by 57% and 36.5%, respectively. The customized design method was more effective in reducing flow resistance of the exhaust system.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567204006/pdf
Primary Topic
Infection Control and Ventilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimizing the flow resistance of an exhaust system by shaping the exhaust hood with a discrete adjoint method

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Infection Control and Ventilation
article

Minimizing the flow resistance of an exhaust system by shaping the exhaust hood with a discrete adjoint method

article en

Abstract

To reduce the flow resistance of an exhaust system, the method of applying individually shape-optimized exhaust hoods, namely mass-production design, is feasible. However, the combined effect of multiple exhaust hoods in an exhaust system may not be optimal in reducing the flow resistance. This investigation thus firstly validated the shape optimization of an individual exhaust hood by a discrete adjoint method to reduce the flow resistance. The design variables were the coordinates of wall boundaries of the exhaust hood. The validation used measured data from a small-scale experiment. This study then applied the validated discrete adjoint method to conduct customized design through the shape optimization of multiple exhaust hoods simultaneously in the exhaust system. The flow resistance under customized design was compared with the method of mass-production design. The results revealed that the customized design led to different shapes of individual exhaust hoods and they were different from the shape of the individually optimized exhaust hood. The flow resistance of the exhaust system under customized design and mass-production design was reduced by 57% and 36.5%, respectively. The customized design method was more effective in reducing flow resistance of the exhaust system.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Infection Control and Ventilation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Minimizing the flow resistance of an exhaust system by shaping the exhaust hood with a discrete adjoint method · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS