Are we on the right path towards indoor environmental well-being?

This position paper challenges the current perspective on indoor environmental quality (IEQ) improvements and proposes a new direction to increase occupant well-being. The purpose of buildings has been to shelter us from the outdoor environment, enabling humans to migrate to colder climates ca. 100,000 years ago. While we remain genetically fit to live outdoors, we spend almost all our time indoors. Research has helped reduce specific health- and comfort-compromising aspects identified in indoor environments. However, this paper argues that we are now less exposed to positive stimuli from outdoor environments, which could be essential for our well-being. The paper presents a series of statements concerning previous and current practice, pointing to unrealized potential for future practice. The statements are followed by reflections on 1) a conceptual comparison between indoor and outdoor conditions, 2) a meta-analysis of selected building developments over time to indicate possibly unfavourable trends, and 3) a proposal for a new direction for future IEQ improvements.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567201049/pdf
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are we on the right path towards indoor environmental well-being?

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Are we on the right path towards indoor environmental well-being?

article en

Abstract

This position paper challenges the current perspective on indoor environmental quality (IEQ) improvements and proposes a new direction to increase occupant well-being. The purpose of buildings has been to shelter us from the outdoor environment, enabling humans to migrate to colder climates ca. 100,000 years ago. While we remain genetically fit to live outdoors, we spend almost all our time indoors. Research has helped reduce specific health- and comfort-compromising aspects identified in indoor environments. However, this paper argues that we are now less exposed to positive stimuli from outdoor environments, which could be essential for our well-being. The paper presents a series of statements concerning previous and current practice, pointing to unrealized potential for future practice. The statements are followed by reflections on 1) a conceptual comparison between indoor and outdoor conditions, 2) a meta-analysis of selected building developments over time to indicate possibly unfavourable trends, and 3) a proposal for a new direction for future IEQ improvements.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.