S1883 Comparative Effectiveness of Vedolizumab vs Infliximab in the Management of Pouchitis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Introduction: Pouchitis is the most common complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Infliximab and recently vedolizumab are increasingly being used for chronic pouchitis. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes among patients treated with infliximab vs vedolizumab using a large real-world federated EHR network. Methods: We utilized the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network to identify adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with pouchitis with prior UC, who received either infliximab or vedolizumab after IPAA. Cohorts were mutually exclusive and excluded patients with concurrent C. difficile infection. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to balance demographics and comorbidities. Outcomes assessed included all-cause hospitalization, pouch excision/ileostomy, pouchoscopy, and recurrent pouchitis over a 10-year follow-up. Measures of association, including risk difference, risk ratio, and odds ratio (OR), confidence intervals (CI), and p values were calculated. Results: In the vedolizumab vs infliximab group (n = 353 each), the risk of hospitalization was similar between groups (40.2% vs 44.5%; OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62–1.13; P = 0.253). Vedolizumab was associated with a significantly lower risk of pouch excision or ileostomy (20.7% vs 27.8%; OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48–0.96; P = 0.028). In contrast, pouchitis recurrence was significantly more common in the vedolizumab group (75.1% vs 64.6%; OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.19–2.29; P = 0.002). Pouchoscopy rates were numerically higher with vedolizumab but did not reach statistical significance (53.8% vs 47.3%; OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.97–1.75; P = 0.083). Conclusion: Vedolizumab use in patients with pouchitis was associated with lower rates of pouch excision but higher rates of pouchitis recurrence compared to infliximab. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm this association.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001134992.87607.53
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1883 Comparative Effectiveness of Vedolizumab vs Infliximab in the Management of Pouchitis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1883 Comparative Effectiveness of Vedolizumab vs Infliximab in the Management of Pouchitis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Pouchitis is the most common complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Infliximab and recently vedolizumab are increasingly being used for chronic pouchitis. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes among patients treated with infliximab vs vedolizumab using a large real-world federated EHR network. Methods: We utilized the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network to identify adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with pouchitis with prior UC, who received either infliximab or vedolizumab after IPAA. Cohorts were mutually exclusive and excluded patients with concurrent C. difficile infection. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to balance demographics and comorbidities. Outcomes assessed included all-cause hospitalization, pouch excision/ileostomy, pouchoscopy, and recurrent pouchitis over a 10-year follow-up. Measures of association, including risk difference, risk ratio, and odds ratio (OR), confidence intervals (CI), and p values were calculated. Results: In the vedolizumab vs infliximab group (n = 353 each), the risk of hospitalization was similar between groups (40.2% vs 44.5%; OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62–1.13; P = 0.253). Vedolizumab was associated with a significantly lower risk of pouch excision or ileostomy (20.7% vs 27.8%; OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48–0.96; P = 0.028). In contrast, pouchitis recurrence was significantly more common in the vedolizumab group (75.1% vs 64.6%; OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.19–2.29; P = 0.002). Pouchoscopy rates were numerically higher with vedolizumab but did not reach statistical significance (53.8% vs 47.3%; OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.97–1.75; P = 0.083). Conclusion: Vedolizumab use in patients with pouchitis was associated with lower rates of pouch excision but higher rates of pouchitis recurrence compared to infliximab. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm this association.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

S1883 Comparative Effectiveness of Vedolizumab vs Infliximab in the Management of Pouchitis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis · The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS