S2241 Redo Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Is Associated With Improvement in Symptoms and Regain of Clinical Success for Refractory Gastroparesis: A Single Center Experience

Introduction: Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) showed promising results in improving gastroparesis (GP) related symptoms and quality of life (QoL). Nevertheless, a proportion of patients fail to respond to G-POEM after initial improvement. Redo G-POEM has been proposed as a management option in this case, but data on safety, feasibility, and outcomes of G-POEM in this group remains scarce. We aimed to assess the safety and describe clinical and scintigraphy outcomes after redo G-POEM. Methods: Prospectively enrolled patients who underwent an initial G-POEM followed by a redo G-POEM at a single institution from February 2018 to May 2025 were included. All redo G-POEM procedures were performed at least 6 months post the initial G-POEM. Evaluations were conducted at baseline and 6 months for the initial and redo G-POEMs. Validated tools were used to assess patient outcomes, including Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM), and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Additionally, 4-hour solid phase gastric emptying scan (GES) results were recorded. Clinical success of redo G-POEM was defined as improvement in GCSI scores by ≥1 point compared to baseline. Results: Fourteen patients (92.9% woman, mean age 48.4 ± 14.2 years) were included in this study. Seven patients (50.0%) had idiopathic, 4 (28.6%) had diabetic, and 3 (21.4%) had post-surgical GP. The median (interquartile range) for the time between initial and redo G-POEMs was 12 (8-27) months. The mean total GCSI score markedly improved from a baseline prior to initial G-POEM of 3.5(±0.8) to 2.4(±1.5) at 6 months post-redo G-POEM (P = 0.047). The average PAGI-SYM total score significantly improved from a baseline prior to initial G-POEM of 3.2(±0.9) to 2.2(±1.3) at 6 months post-redo G-POEM (P = 0.008). The mean SF 36 QOL total score and mean 4-hour gastric retention using GES showed improvement trends after redo G-POEM but did not reach statistical significance. Clinical success (using the post G-POEM failure GSCI score) was achieved in 50.0% of patients who underwent redo G-POEM. There were no reported adverse events. Conclusion: Redo G-POEM significantly improved symptom severity for patients with primary failures or those who experienced symptom recurrence post G-POEM with no associated adverse events. Additional research involving a larger cohort is required to determine which patients would derive the greatest benefit from redo G-POEM.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136424.07112.82
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2241 Redo Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Is Associated With Improvement in Symptoms and Regain of Clinical Success for Refractory Gastroparesis: A Single Center Experience

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

S2241 Redo Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Is Associated With Improvement in Symptoms and Regain of Clinical Success for Refractory Gastroparesis: A Single Center Experience

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) showed promising results in improving gastroparesis (GP) related symptoms and quality of life (QoL). Nevertheless, a proportion of patients fail to respond to G-POEM after initial improvement. Redo G-POEM has been proposed as a management option in this case, but data on safety, feasibility, and outcomes of G-POEM in this group remains scarce. We aimed to assess the safety and describe clinical and scintigraphy outcomes after redo G-POEM. Methods: Prospectively enrolled patients who underwent an initial G-POEM followed by a redo G-POEM at a single institution from February 2018 to May 2025 were included. All redo G-POEM procedures were performed at least 6 months post the initial G-POEM. Evaluations were conducted at baseline and 6 months for the initial and redo G-POEMs. Validated tools were used to assess patient outcomes, including Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM), and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Additionally, 4-hour solid phase gastric emptying scan (GES) results were recorded. Clinical success of redo G-POEM was defined as improvement in GCSI scores by ≥1 point compared to baseline. Results: Fourteen patients (92.9% woman, mean age 48.4 ± 14.2 years) were included in this study. Seven patients (50.0%) had idiopathic, 4 (28.6%) had diabetic, and 3 (21.4%) had post-surgical GP. The median (interquartile range) for the time between initial and redo G-POEMs was 12 (8-27) months. The mean total GCSI score markedly improved from a baseline prior to initial G-POEM of 3.5(±0.8) to 2.4(±1.5) at 6 months post-redo G-POEM (P = 0.047). The average PAGI-SYM total score significantly improved from a baseline prior to initial G-POEM of 3.2(±0.9) to 2.2(±1.3) at 6 months post-redo G-POEM (P = 0.008). The mean SF 36 QOL total score and mean 4-hour gastric retention using GES showed improvement trends after redo G-POEM but did not reach statistical significance. Clinical success (using the post G-POEM failure GSCI score) was achieved in 50.0% of patients who underwent redo G-POEM. There were no reported adverse events. Conclusion: Redo G-POEM significantly improved symptom severity for patients with primary failures or those who experienced symptom recurrence post G-POEM with no associated adverse events. Additional research involving a larger cohort is required to determine which patients would derive the greatest benefit from redo G-POEM.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.