S2168 Critical Timing of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Acute Cholangitis: Early Procedures Yield Better Outcomes

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a critical procedure for diagnosing and treating various pancreatobiliary disorders. This study assesses the effect of early vs late ERCP on mortality and readmissions in acute cholangitis. Methods: We used a National Readmissions Database (2016 -2021) to identify acute cholangitis who underwent therapeutic ERCP within 1 week of admission. Early ERCP was defined as ERCP performed on the same day of admission or the next day (days 0 or 1, < 48 h), and late ERCP was performed on days 2 to 7 of admission. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the ERCP timing. Results: A total of 330,046 records are analyzed, out of which 38,339 have 30-day readmissions with acute cholangitis. Of these, 53% had early ERCP, while 47% had late ERCP. Patients undergoing early ERCP were significantly younger than those undergoing late ERCP (mean age 29 vs 42 years, P = 0.01). The late ERCP group had a significantly higher proportion of men (55% vs 49%, P = 0.03) and differing health insurance distributions (e.g., Medicare: 37% late vs 16% early, P = 0.04). Indications significantly more prevalent in the late ERCP group included abdominal pain (6.6% vs 0.2%, P = 0.03), cholelithiasis (63.6% vs 53.6%, P = 0.04), biliary obstruction (20.5% vs 3.3%, P = 0.02), acute pancreatitis (15% vs 3.3%, P = 0.01), and pancreatic neoplasm (4.5% vs 0%, P = 0.03). Conversely, chronic pancreatitis was significantly more common in the early ERCP group (17.7% vs 2.4%, P = 0.01). The late ERCP group experienced significantly higher overall mortality (10.9% vs 0%, P = 0.01). A more granular analysis of mortality based on the day of ERCP revealed an increasing trend with delay: mortality was approximately 2%-3% for ERCP on Day 1, 15% on Day 2, 2%-3% on Days 3-5, rising to approximately 22% on Day 6, and 50% on Day 7. The late ERCP group also had significantly longer stay (18 vs 4.2 days, P = 0.01) and greater total charges ($291,517 vs $70,307, P = 0.01). Conclusion: Patients in the late ERCP group were older, more frequently man, and presented with a higher burden of acute conditions such as biliary obstruction and acute pancreatitis. Late ERCP is associated with worse outcomes including higher mortality that increased with each day of delay, longer hospital stays, and greater total healthcare charges. Conversely, early ERCP was associated with younger patients, a higher prevalence of chronic pancreatitis, and notably better outcomes across all measured parameters.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136132.24575.0c
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2168 Critical Timing of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Acute Cholangitis: Early Procedures Yield Better Outcomes

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

S2168 Critical Timing of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Acute Cholangitis: Early Procedures Yield Better Outcomes

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a critical procedure for diagnosing and treating various pancreatobiliary disorders. This study assesses the effect of early vs late ERCP on mortality and readmissions in acute cholangitis. Methods: We used a National Readmissions Database (2016 -2021) to identify acute cholangitis who underwent therapeutic ERCP within 1 week of admission. Early ERCP was defined as ERCP performed on the same day of admission or the next day (days 0 or 1, < 48 h), and late ERCP was performed on days 2 to 7 of admission. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the ERCP timing. Results: A total of 330,046 records are analyzed, out of which 38,339 have 30-day readmissions with acute cholangitis. Of these, 53% had early ERCP, while 47% had late ERCP. Patients undergoing early ERCP were significantly younger than those undergoing late ERCP (mean age 29 vs 42 years, P = 0.01). The late ERCP group had a significantly higher proportion of men (55% vs 49%, P = 0.03) and differing health insurance distributions (e.g., Medicare: 37% late vs 16% early, P = 0.04). Indications significantly more prevalent in the late ERCP group included abdominal pain (6.6% vs 0.2%, P = 0.03), cholelithiasis (63.6% vs 53.6%, P = 0.04), biliary obstruction (20.5% vs 3.3%, P = 0.02), acute pancreatitis (15% vs 3.3%, P = 0.01), and pancreatic neoplasm (4.5% vs 0%, P = 0.03). Conversely, chronic pancreatitis was significantly more common in the early ERCP group (17.7% vs 2.4%, P = 0.01). The late ERCP group experienced significantly higher overall mortality (10.9% vs 0%, P = 0.01). A more granular analysis of mortality based on the day of ERCP revealed an increasing trend with delay: mortality was approximately 2%-3% for ERCP on Day 1, 15% on Day 2, 2%-3% on Days 3-5, rising to approximately 22% on Day 6, and 50% on Day 7. The late ERCP group also had significantly longer stay (18 vs 4.2 days, P = 0.01) and greater total charges ($291,517 vs $70,307, P = 0.01). Conclusion: Patients in the late ERCP group were older, more frequently man, and presented with a higher burden of acute conditions such as biliary obstruction and acute pancreatitis. Late ERCP is associated with worse outcomes including higher mortality that increased with each day of delay, longer hospital stays, and greater total healthcare charges. Conversely, early ERCP was associated with younger patients, a higher prevalence of chronic pancreatitis, and notably better outcomes across all measured parameters.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.