S2112 Efficacy of Probiotics in Reducing Post-Colonoscopy Gastrointestinal Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction: A colonoscopy is a crucial diagnostic procedure for evaluating intestinal health. Bowel preparation is vital for a successful colonoscopy, as it ensures clear visualization of the colonic mucosa. However, this process often reduces microbial diversity and disrupts the balance between beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, causing symptoms such as abdominal pain, bloating, and diarrhea, which may persist after the procedure. Probiotics have been suggested to alleviate post-colonoscopy symptoms by restoring microbial balance, but their efficacy has been inconsistent. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of probiotic supplementation in reducing post-colonoscopy gastrointestinal symptoms. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in collaboration with a medical librarian. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English and involving patients aged 18 years or older at the time of colonoscopy were included. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and τ2. Results: Data from 10 randomized controlled trials comprising 2,345 participants were included. There are no statistically significant differences in age, gender, or body mass index distribution between the treatment and control groups. Probiotic use significantly reduced the risk of post-colonoscopy vomiting (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.18–0.65, P = 0.001, I² = 0%), abdominal pain (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56–0.90, P = 0.004, I² = 0%), and bloating (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43–0.86, P = 0.005, I² = 43.7%). The effects for constipation (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41–1.01, P = 0.054, I² = 0%) and diarrhea (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.51-1.18, P = 0.239, I² = 0%) were borderline significant in post-colonoscopy risks. No significant effects were observed for flatulence (OR: 0.75, P = 0.44, I² = 0%), heartburn (OR: 0.99, P = 0.97, I² = 0%), or nausea (OR: 0.60, P = 0.28, I² = 88.6%), with nausea showing high between-study variability. The sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results, with no single study having an undue influence on the outcome. No publication bias was found (Egger's test, P = 0.139). Conclusion: Probiotics effectively reduce specific post-colonoscopy symptoms, particularly abdominal pain, bloating, and vomiting, with consistent effects across studies. These findings underscore the potential of probiotics to enhance patient experiences and may, in turn, encourage more patients to undergo future colonoscopies.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001135908.61283.ab
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2112 Efficacy of Probiotics in Reducing Post-Colonoscopy Gastrointestinal Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

S2112 Efficacy of Probiotics in Reducing Post-Colonoscopy Gastrointestinal Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

article en

Abstract

Introduction: A colonoscopy is a crucial diagnostic procedure for evaluating intestinal health. Bowel preparation is vital for a successful colonoscopy, as it ensures clear visualization of the colonic mucosa. However, this process often reduces microbial diversity and disrupts the balance between beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, causing symptoms such as abdominal pain, bloating, and diarrhea, which may persist after the procedure. Probiotics have been suggested to alleviate post-colonoscopy symptoms by restoring microbial balance, but their efficacy has been inconsistent. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of probiotic supplementation in reducing post-colonoscopy gastrointestinal symptoms. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in collaboration with a medical librarian. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English and involving patients aged 18 years or older at the time of colonoscopy were included. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and τ2. Results: Data from 10 randomized controlled trials comprising 2,345 participants were included. There are no statistically significant differences in age, gender, or body mass index distribution between the treatment and control groups. Probiotic use significantly reduced the risk of post-colonoscopy vomiting (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.18–0.65, P = 0.001, I² = 0%), abdominal pain (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56–0.90, P = 0.004, I² = 0%), and bloating (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43–0.86, P = 0.005, I² = 43.7%). The effects for constipation (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41–1.01, P = 0.054, I² = 0%) and diarrhea (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.51-1.18, P = 0.239, I² = 0%) were borderline significant in post-colonoscopy risks. No significant effects were observed for flatulence (OR: 0.75, P = 0.44, I² = 0%), heartburn (OR: 0.99, P = 0.97, I² = 0%), or nausea (OR: 0.60, P = 0.28, I² = 88.6%), with nausea showing high between-study variability. The sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results, with no single study having an undue influence on the outcome. No publication bias was found (Egger's test, P = 0.139). Conclusion: Probiotics effectively reduce specific post-colonoscopy symptoms, particularly abdominal pain, bloating, and vomiting, with consistent effects across studies. These findings underscore the potential of probiotics to enhance patient experiences and may, in turn, encourage more patients to undergo future colonoscopies.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.