S1849 ARMOR Study: Immunogenicity and Safety of Recombinant Spike Protein Vaccine in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Liver Transplant Recipients Comparable to Healthy Controls

Introduction: mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are safe in immunosuppressed populations, data on protein-based vaccines remain limited. We evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of Novavax COVID-19 vaccine (NVX-CoV2601) in immunosuppressed patients. Methods: This single-center, prospective ARMOR study included adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or solid organ transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy with ≥3 prior COVID-19 vaccine doses. Participants received one NVX-CoV2601 booster with follow-up at one and 6 months. Antibody concentrations were measured using anti-spike IgG ELISA and pseudovirus neutralization. The primary outcome was change in antibody concentration from baseline to one month post-vaccination in ARMOR participants. Secondary outcomes included evaluating sustained antibody concentration at 6 months post-immunization, humoral immunogenicity in the ARMOR cohort compared to an age/sex-matched healthy control cohort, adverse events, and safety (IBD flares or transplant rejection). Statistical analyses included paired t-tests for antibody concentration changes and ANCOVA with baseline adjustment for between-group comparisons. GMTs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using log-transformed values. Results: Twenty-one patients, 18 IBD and 3 liver transplant recipients, were enrolled in ARMOR and compared with 42 age/sex-matched healthy controls (Mean age 47.65, 60% males). In the ARMOR cohort, anti-spike IgG GMT increased significantly post-immunization (22,969 to 66,639 EU/mL at one month; 2.9-fold increase, P = 0.001). Healthy controls showed an increase from 54,812 to 129,813 EU/mL (2.4-fold increase; P < 0.001). Neutralizing antibody analysis showed similar trends, with ARMOR participants demonstrating a 3.6-fold increase from baseline (GMT 174.6 ID50 to 628.0 ID50; P = 0.002) vs controls' 1.6-fold increase (P = 0.001), with no statistically significant difference between groups at day 28 after baseline adjustment (GMTR 1.12; P = 0.728). At 6 months, both binding and neutralizing antibodies waned faster in immunosuppressed subjects (GMTR 0.60, P = 0.009 for binding; GMTR 0.44, P = 0.008 for neutralizing) compared to controls. NVX-CoV2601 was well tolerated, with mild reactogenicity, and was not associated with IBD flares or solid organ rejection. Conclusion: NVX-CoV2601 was safe and immunogenic with similar antibody responses in immunosuppressed patients compared to healthy controls, in contrast to that seen with mRNA vaccines.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001134856.32950.47
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1849 ARMOR Study: Immunogenicity and Safety of Recombinant Spike Protein Vaccine in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Liver Transplant Recipients Comparable to Healthy Controls

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

S1849 ARMOR Study: Immunogenicity and Safety of Recombinant Spike Protein Vaccine in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Liver Transplant Recipients Comparable to Healthy Controls

article en

Abstract

Introduction: mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are safe in immunosuppressed populations, data on protein-based vaccines remain limited. We evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of Novavax COVID-19 vaccine (NVX-CoV2601) in immunosuppressed patients. Methods: This single-center, prospective ARMOR study included adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or solid organ transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy with ≥3 prior COVID-19 vaccine doses. Participants received one NVX-CoV2601 booster with follow-up at one and 6 months. Antibody concentrations were measured using anti-spike IgG ELISA and pseudovirus neutralization. The primary outcome was change in antibody concentration from baseline to one month post-vaccination in ARMOR participants. Secondary outcomes included evaluating sustained antibody concentration at 6 months post-immunization, humoral immunogenicity in the ARMOR cohort compared to an age/sex-matched healthy control cohort, adverse events, and safety (IBD flares or transplant rejection). Statistical analyses included paired t-tests for antibody concentration changes and ANCOVA with baseline adjustment for between-group comparisons. GMTs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using log-transformed values. Results: Twenty-one patients, 18 IBD and 3 liver transplant recipients, were enrolled in ARMOR and compared with 42 age/sex-matched healthy controls (Mean age 47.65, 60% males). In the ARMOR cohort, anti-spike IgG GMT increased significantly post-immunization (22,969 to 66,639 EU/mL at one month; 2.9-fold increase, P = 0.001). Healthy controls showed an increase from 54,812 to 129,813 EU/mL (2.4-fold increase; P < 0.001). Neutralizing antibody analysis showed similar trends, with ARMOR participants demonstrating a 3.6-fold increase from baseline (GMT 174.6 ID50 to 628.0 ID50; P = 0.002) vs controls' 1.6-fold increase (P = 0.001), with no statistically significant difference between groups at day 28 after baseline adjustment (GMTR 1.12; P = 0.728). At 6 months, both binding and neutralizing antibodies waned faster in immunosuppressed subjects (GMTR 0.60, P = 0.009 for binding; GMTR 0.44, P = 0.008 for neutralizing) compared to controls. NVX-CoV2601 was well tolerated, with mild reactogenicity, and was not associated with IBD flares or solid organ rejection. Conclusion: NVX-CoV2601 was safe and immunogenic with similar antibody responses in immunosuppressed patients compared to healthy controls, in contrast to that seen with mRNA vaccines.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.