Economic Policy Uncertainty and Bank‐Level Stock Returns Volatility of the United States: A Mixed‐Frequency Perspective

Abstract This paper examines the predictive power of the monthly Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) index for the daily return volatility of 149 banking stocks in the United States, over the period from August 2000 to August 2023. Using a Glosten, Jagannathan, and Runkle‐generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity‐mixed data sampling (GJR‐GARCH‐MIDAS) model, the results show that EPU plays a significant role in predicting the volatility of banking stocks. Across the groups of large, medium, and small banks, banking stock volatility tends to increase in response to EPU, highlighting the significance of heightened uncertainties surrounding future government economic policies for the volatility of banking stocks. EPU has a stronger impact on large banks, possibly due to their complexity, funding structure, perceived ‘too big to fail’ status, and systemic interconnectedness. The outperformance of the GJR‐GARCH‐MIDAS‐EPU model holds in an out‐of‐sample analysis, regardless of market capitalization and forecast horizons.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Notes
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.70032
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Economic Policy Uncertainty and Bank‐Level Stock Returns Volatility of the United States: A Mixed‐Frequency Perspective

Economic Notes
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

Economic Policy Uncertainty and Bank‐Level Stock Returns Volatility of the United States: A Mixed‐Frequency Perspective

article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the predictive power of the monthly Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) index for the daily return volatility of 149 banking stocks in the United States, over the period from August 2000 to August 2023. Using a Glosten, Jagannathan, and Runkle‐generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity‐mixed data sampling (GJR‐GARCH‐MIDAS) model, the results show that EPU plays a significant role in predicting the volatility of banking stocks. Across the groups of large, medium, and small banks, banking stock volatility tends to increase in response to EPU, highlighting the significance of heightened uncertainties surrounding future government economic policies for the volatility of banking stocks. EPU has a stronger impact on large banks, possibly due to their complexity, funding structure, perceived ‘too big to fail’ status, and systemic interconnectedness. The outperformance of the GJR‐GARCH‐MIDAS‐EPU model holds in an out‐of‐sample analysis, regardless of market capitalization and forecast horizons.

Economic NotesVol. 55(3)
University of Ibadan (NG), Lebanese American University (LB), University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Economic Policy Uncertainty and Bank‐Level Stock Returns Volatility of the United States: A Mixed‐Frequency Perspective · Economic Notes (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS