How does being a fully EV automotive firm affect performance?

This study investigates whether being a fully electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer affects firm performance, using a panel of 15 global automakers from 1999 to 2023. Three EV-only firms—Tesla, BYD, and Rivian—are compared against traditional manufacturers using two financial metrics: return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE). Guided by Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation and the distinction between radical and incremental innovation, the analysis explores the short-term trade-offs of adopting a fully electric strategy. Results from fixed-effects regression models reveal that EV-only firms experience a statistically significant 22.27 percentage point reduction in ROA, reflecting lower operational efficiency. While the ROE estimate is also negative, it is not statistically significant, suggesting greater variability in shareholder outcomes. These findings suggest that while EV-only firms are positioned for long-term transformation, they face real short-term performance costs tied to capital intensity, vertical integration, and evolving value networks. The study highlights the strategic and financial risks of radical innovation and offers practical recommendations for managing these trade-offs through scalable operations, strategic partnerships, and transparent investor communication.

Publication Details

Journal
Western CEDAR (Western Washington University)
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How does being a fully EV automotive firm affect performance?

Western CEDAR (Western Washington University)
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

How does being a fully EV automotive firm affect performance?

article en

Abstract

This study investigates whether being a fully electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer affects firm performance, using a panel of 15 global automakers from 1999 to 2023. Three EV-only firms—Tesla, BYD, and Rivian—are compared against traditional manufacturers using two financial metrics: return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE). Guided by Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation and the distinction between radical and incremental innovation, the analysis explores the short-term trade-offs of adopting a fully electric strategy. Results from fixed-effects regression models reveal that EV-only firms experience a statistically significant 22.27 percentage point reduction in ROA, reflecting lower operational efficiency. While the ROE estimate is also negative, it is not statistically significant, suggesting greater variability in shareholder outcomes. These findings suggest that while EV-only firms are positioned for long-term transformation, they face real short-term performance costs tied to capital intensity, vertical integration, and evolving value networks. The study highlights the strategic and financial risks of radical innovation and offers practical recommendations for managing these trade-offs through scalable operations, strategic partnerships, and transparent investor communication.

Western CEDAR (Western Washington University)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.