US 'hegemony' in the World Bank

International Political Economy (IPE) builds on the premise that every economic issue is simultaneously a political issue, even more so with respect to the international than to the national realm. IPE scholars have treated the World Bank as a major economic and political actor in the international arena, and studied how it is influenced by and influences different states and other interest groups. We provide an overview of the IPE perspective on the Bank, paying special attention to the United States as its largest and most powerful shareholder and to Gramsci's hegemony theory. We argue that two concepts from sociological organization theory, 'strategic ignorance' and 'organized hypocrisy', allow us to better understand the workings of US 'hegemony' in the Bank. We illustrate their analytical value in combination with a hegemony framework by applying them to three cases of power struggles over the content of 'development knowledge' and 'best practice policies'.

Publication Details

Journal
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Published
2024-09-12
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

US 'hegemony' in the World Bank

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
International Development and Aid
article

US 'hegemony' in the World Bank

article en

Abstract

International Political Economy (IPE) builds on the premise that every economic issue is simultaneously a political issue, even more so with respect to the international than to the national realm. IPE scholars have treated the World Bank as a major economic and political actor in the international arena, and studied how it is influenced by and influences different states and other interest groups. We provide an overview of the IPE perspective on the Bank, paying special attention to the United States as its largest and most powerful shareholder and to Gramsci's hegemony theory. We argue that two concepts from sociological organization theory, 'strategic ignorance' and 'organized hypocrisy', allow us to better understand the workings of US 'hegemony' in the Bank. We illustrate their analytical value in combination with a hegemony framework by applying them to three cases of power struggles over the content of 'development knowledge' and 'best practice policies'.

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.