Efficacy of a King’s Goal Attainment Theory-Based Support Model on Breastfeeding Outcomes in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Yuexia Liu,1 Yin Ying,2 Xianling Zou1 1Integrated Obstetrics District 3, Hangzhou Women’s Hospital (Hangzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, People’s Republic of China; 2Nursing Department, Hangzhou Women’s Hospital (Hangzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Xianling Zou, Email [email protected]: To evaluate the effectiveness of a breastfeeding support model based on King’s Goal Attainment Theory in improving breastfeeding outcomes and metabolic health among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 120 women with GDM who delivered at a tertiary hospital between March 2022 and March 2024. Participants were divided into two groups based on the type of care received: the study group (n = 60) received a structured, theory-based breastfeeding support intervention involving goal negotiation, dynamic assessment, and interactive feedback delivered by a multidisciplinary team; the control group (n = 60) received routine breastfeeding support. Primary outcome was continued breastfeeding rate at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postpartum. Secondary outcomes included breastfeeding self-efficacy (BSES-SF), glycemic control (FPG and HbA1c), and incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia. Statistical analyses included t-tests, χ²-tests, and generalized estimating equations (GEE).Results: The study group showed significantly higher continued breastfeeding rates at all time points: 80.0% vs 58.3% at 6 weeks (p = 0.010), 73.3% vs 46.7% at 3 months (p = 0.003), and 65.0% vs 36.7% at 6 months (p = 0.002). At 6 weeks postpartum, the study group also had higher breastfeeding self-efficacy scores (62.50 ± 5.31 vs 53.11 ± 6.82, p < 0.001) and better glycemic control, with higher proportions achieving target FPG (75.0% vs 51.7%, p = 0.008) and HbA1c (80.0% vs 60.0%, p = 0.017). The incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia was significantly lower in the study group (8.33% vs 21.67%, p = 0.041).Conclusion: The breastfeeding support model based on King’s Goal Attainment Theory was associated with significantly improved breastfeeding rates, self-efficacy, glycemic control, and neonatal outcomes in women with GDM. This theory-driven, multidisciplinary approach shows promise for enhancing perinatal care in this high-risk population.Keywords: goal attainment theory, gestational diabetes mellitus, breastfeeding, self-efficacy, intervention study

Publication Details

Journal
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Published
2025-11-08
Primary Topic
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of a King’s Goal Attainment Theory-Based Support Model on Breastfeeding Outcomes in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
article

Efficacy of a King’s Goal Attainment Theory-Based Support Model on Breastfeeding Outcomes in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Quasi-Experimental Study

article en

Abstract

Yuexia Liu,1 Yin Ying,2 Xianling Zou1 1Integrated Obstetrics District 3, Hangzhou Women’s Hospital (Hangzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, People’s Republic of China; 2Nursing Department, Hangzhou Women’s Hospital (Hangzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Xianling Zou, Email [email protected]: To evaluate the effectiveness of a breastfeeding support model based on King’s Goal Attainment Theory in improving breastfeeding outcomes and metabolic health among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 120 women with GDM who delivered at a tertiary hospital between March 2022 and March 2024. Participants were divided into two groups based on the type of care received: the study group (n = 60) received a structured, theory-based breastfeeding support intervention involving goal negotiation, dynamic assessment, and interactive feedback delivered by a multidisciplinary team; the control group (n = 60) received routine breastfeeding support. Primary outcome was continued breastfeeding rate at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postpartum. Secondary outcomes included breastfeeding self-efficacy (BSES-SF), glycemic control (FPG and HbA1c), and incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia. Statistical analyses included t-tests, χ²-tests, and generalized estimating equations (GEE).Results: The study group showed significantly higher continued breastfeeding rates at all time points: 80.0% vs 58.3% at 6 weeks (p = 0.010), 73.3% vs 46.7% at 3 months (p = 0.003), and 65.0% vs 36.7% at 6 months (p = 0.002). At 6 weeks postpartum, the study group also had higher breastfeeding self-efficacy scores (62.50 ± 5.31 vs 53.11 ± 6.82, p < 0.001) and better glycemic control, with higher proportions achieving target FPG (75.0% vs 51.7%, p = 0.008) and HbA1c (80.0% vs 60.0%, p = 0.017). The incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia was significantly lower in the study group (8.33% vs 21.67%, p = 0.041).Conclusion: The breastfeeding support model based on King’s Goal Attainment Theory was associated with significantly improved breastfeeding rates, self-efficacy, glycemic control, and neonatal outcomes in women with GDM. This theory-driven, multidisciplinary approach shows promise for enhancing perinatal care in this high-risk population.Keywords: goal attainment theory, gestational diabetes mellitus, breastfeeding, self-efficacy, intervention study

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.