Affective Political Polarization Pre- and Post-Election: Comparisons Two Months into the New Administration

In the current political climate, it seems as if the two main political parties are more polarized than ever. Although some studies have found that liberals are less likely than conservatives to express prejudice and affirm stereotypes (Sparkman & Eidelman, 2016), other studies have demonstrated that liberals and conservatives both hold prejudices toward groups they view as threatening (Brandt et al., 2014). While threatened by dissimilar groups, they also see groups similar to them favorably (Chambers et al., 2012). Another group of students working with a similar project investigated how the election may have affected attitudes of each group toward the other by measuring attitudes two weeks before and one week after the election. Since President Trump’s inauguration, there have been an influx of new policies that have gained a lot of attention on various media sources (Broadwater, 2025). This poster examines feelings now that these new policies have begun taking effect.

Publication Details

Journal
UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa)
Published
2025-04-08
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Affective Political Polarization Pre- and Post-Election: Comparisons Two Months into the New Administration

UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa)
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Affective Political Polarization Pre- and Post-Election: Comparisons Two Months into the New Administration

article en

Abstract

In the current political climate, it seems as if the two main political parties are more polarized than ever. Although some studies have found that liberals are less likely than conservatives to express prejudice and affirm stereotypes (Sparkman & Eidelman, 2016), other studies have demonstrated that liberals and conservatives both hold prejudices toward groups they view as threatening (Brandt et al., 2014). While threatened by dissimilar groups, they also see groups similar to them favorably (Chambers et al., 2012). Another group of students working with a similar project investigated how the election may have affected attitudes of each group toward the other by measuring attitudes two weeks before and one week after the election. Since President Trump’s inauguration, there have been an influx of new policies that have gained a lot of attention on various media sources (Broadwater, 2025). This poster examines feelings now that these new policies have begun taking effect.

UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.