Primerjava med tradicionalnimi in spletnimi fokusnimi skupinami za testiranje občutljivih anketnih vprašalnikov

The study compares traditional synchronous offline focus groups with synchronous online focus groups using chat to pretest survey questions on a sensitive topic. Despite expecting higher data quality in the online focus groups due to their private setting, the comparison of 42 focus groups (21 of each type) revealed minimal differences in data quantity and quality. Moreover, the differences observed were attributed to transcript quality, the moderators’ experience, and social skills, participant homogeneity, and familiarity among participants, rather than the focus group setting. This suggests online focus groups can provide a viable alternative or complement to offline focus groups for pretesting sensitive survey questions, especially when faced with cost constraints, epidemic, large geographical distances, or other limits on face-to-face interactions.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Published
2025-10-28
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primerjava med tradicionalnimi in spletnimi fokusnimi skupinami za testiranje občutljivih anketnih vprašalnikov

Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

Primerjava med tradicionalnimi in spletnimi fokusnimi skupinami za testiranje občutljivih anketnih vprašalnikov

article en

Abstract

The study compares traditional synchronous offline focus groups with synchronous online focus groups using chat to pretest survey questions on a sensitive topic. Despite expecting higher data quality in the online focus groups due to their private setting, the comparison of 42 focus groups (21 of each type) revealed minimal differences in data quantity and quality. Moreover, the differences observed were attributed to transcript quality, the moderators’ experience, and social skills, participant homogeneity, and familiarity among participants, rather than the focus group setting. This suggests online focus groups can provide a viable alternative or complement to offline focus groups for pretesting sensitive survey questions, especially when faced with cost constraints, epidemic, large geographical distances, or other limits on face-to-face interactions.

Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.