Sistematični pregled digitalnih pomočnikov za pisanje pri razvoju pisnih spretnosti pri angleščini kot tujem jeziku

Digital writing assistants that deliver Automated Written Corrective Feedback (AWCF) have emerged as valuable tools for reducing teachers’ workload by lessening the time and effort required to provide feedback. When implemented effectively, these tools can enhance students’ writing quality, foster a more holistic understanding of the writing process, and enable learners to revise and correct their work independently. This systematic literature review, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 protocol, synthesises research on the role of digital writing assistants in providing AWCF. It reviews 22 peer-reviewed English-language papers published between 2018 and 2023, which examine these tools in the context of developing EFL students’ writing skills, in comparison with traditional teacher-generated feedback or in hybrid approaches combining both. The participants in the studies were undergraduates majoring in EFL, along with graduates from other disciplines. The writing tasks focused mainly on essay writing but also included paragraph and research paper writing. The findings highlight that students particularly value the immediacy and accuracy of feedback, which typically addresses areas such as grammar, sentence structure, idea development, word choice, style, cohesion, and coherence. Users receive error corrections and suggested improvements through various methods, including markers, highlighting, meta-linguistic comments, direct suggestions, and interactive lessons. Although occasional false positives occur, the tools are generally perceived as effective in improving students’ writing performance. Importantly, the results support hybrid approaches and underscore the teacher’s vital role in mediating the process. In sum, AWCF writing assistants should be systematically integrated into classroom instruction as supplementary tools, aligned with learning outcomes and supported by clear guidance on interpreting and applying feedback.

Publication Details

Journal
DiRROS repository (University of Maribor)
Published
2025-10-31
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sistematični pregled digitalnih pomočnikov za pisanje pri razvoju pisnih spretnosti pri angleščini kot tujem jeziku

DiRROS repository (University of Maribor)
Digital Communication and Language
article

Sistematični pregled digitalnih pomočnikov za pisanje pri razvoju pisnih spretnosti pri angleščini kot tujem jeziku

article en

Abstract

Digital writing assistants that deliver Automated Written Corrective Feedback (AWCF) have emerged as valuable tools for reducing teachers’ workload by lessening the time and effort required to provide feedback. When implemented effectively, these tools can enhance students’ writing quality, foster a more holistic understanding of the writing process, and enable learners to revise and correct their work independently. This systematic literature review, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 protocol, synthesises research on the role of digital writing assistants in providing AWCF. It reviews 22 peer-reviewed English-language papers published between 2018 and 2023, which examine these tools in the context of developing EFL students’ writing skills, in comparison with traditional teacher-generated feedback or in hybrid approaches combining both. The participants in the studies were undergraduates majoring in EFL, along with graduates from other disciplines. The writing tasks focused mainly on essay writing but also included paragraph and research paper writing. The findings highlight that students particularly value the immediacy and accuracy of feedback, which typically addresses areas such as grammar, sentence structure, idea development, word choice, style, cohesion, and coherence. Users receive error corrections and suggested improvements through various methods, including markers, highlighting, meta-linguistic comments, direct suggestions, and interactive lessons. Although occasional false positives occur, the tools are generally perceived as effective in improving students’ writing performance. Importantly, the results support hybrid approaches and underscore the teacher’s vital role in mediating the process. In sum, AWCF writing assistants should be systematically integrated into classroom instruction as supplementary tools, aligned with learning outcomes and supported by clear guidance on interpreting and applying feedback.

DiRROS repository (University of Maribor)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Digital Communication and Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.