Effects of acute static stretching and dynamic warm-up protocols on shoulder function in young adult male athletes with shoulder impingement syndrome:A randomized controlled crossover trial

Background: Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is common among overhead athletes. Static stretching (SS) and dynamic warm-up (DW) are widely used, but their acute effects on comprehensive shoulder function in athletes with SIS are not fully understood. This study compared the acute effects of SS, DW, and a combined protocol (SS+DW) on range of motion (ROM), stability, proprioception, and strength in male athletes with SIS and healthy controls. Methods: In this randomized controlled crossover trial, 25 male athletes with SIS and 25 healthy controls performed SS, DW, and SS+DW protocols in a randomized order. Outcomes included shoulder internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) ROM, Y-Balance Test (YBT) performance, joint position sense (JPS) accuracy, and isokinetic strength, measured at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and an hour follow-up. Data were analyzed using mixed-design ANOVA. Results: All protocols significantly improved IR and ER ROM (p < 0.05), with SS producing the greatest gains for the SIS group (IR +4.4°, d = 1.25; ER +3.4°, d = 1.02). For the SIS group, DW resulted in the largest improvements in YBT performance (+7.4 cm, d = 1.09; p < 0.05) and markedly enhanced JPS accuracy (error reduction of –3.8°, d = 6.66; p < 0.05). In contrast, SS increased proprioceptive error in SIS athletes (+1.2°, d = 2.91; p < 0.05). Isokinetic strength analysis showed that SS significantly reduced eccentric IR strength at 60°/s (–2.5 Nm, d = 0.69; p < 0.05), whereas DW improved concentric ER strength at 60°/s (+0.6 Nm, d = 0.13; p < 0.05). Across all outcomes, the combined protocol produced effect sizes ranging from d = 0.08 to 3.06, representing small to large effects (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The findings indicate that while all warm-ups improve ROM and stability, DW offers the most comprehensive benefits for athletes with SIS by enhancing proprioception and strength without the performance inhibition associated with SS. DW is recommended for pre-activity routines when neuromuscular readiness is critical.

Publication Details

Journal
Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University)
Published
2025-12-20
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of acute static stretching and dynamic warm-up protocols on shoulder function in young adult male athletes with shoulder impingement syndrome:A randomized controlled crossover trial

Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University)
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Effects of acute static stretching and dynamic warm-up protocols on shoulder function in young adult male athletes with shoulder impingement syndrome:A randomized controlled crossover trial

article en

Abstract

Background: Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is common among overhead athletes. Static stretching (SS) and dynamic warm-up (DW) are widely used, but their acute effects on comprehensive shoulder function in athletes with SIS are not fully understood. This study compared the acute effects of SS, DW, and a combined protocol (SS+DW) on range of motion (ROM), stability, proprioception, and strength in male athletes with SIS and healthy controls. Methods: In this randomized controlled crossover trial, 25 male athletes with SIS and 25 healthy controls performed SS, DW, and SS+DW protocols in a randomized order. Outcomes included shoulder internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) ROM, Y-Balance Test (YBT) performance, joint position sense (JPS) accuracy, and isokinetic strength, measured at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and an hour follow-up. Data were analyzed using mixed-design ANOVA. Results: All protocols significantly improved IR and ER ROM (p < 0.05), with SS producing the greatest gains for the SIS group (IR +4.4°, d = 1.25; ER +3.4°, d = 1.02). For the SIS group, DW resulted in the largest improvements in YBT performance (+7.4 cm, d = 1.09; p < 0.05) and markedly enhanced JPS accuracy (error reduction of –3.8°, d = 6.66; p < 0.05). In contrast, SS increased proprioceptive error in SIS athletes (+1.2°, d = 2.91; p < 0.05). Isokinetic strength analysis showed that SS significantly reduced eccentric IR strength at 60°/s (–2.5 Nm, d = 0.69; p < 0.05), whereas DW improved concentric ER strength at 60°/s (+0.6 Nm, d = 0.13; p < 0.05). Across all outcomes, the combined protocol produced effect sizes ranging from d = 0.08 to 3.06, representing small to large effects (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The findings indicate that while all warm-ups improve ROM and stability, DW offers the most comprehensive benefits for athletes with SIS by enhancing proprioception and strength without the performance inhibition associated with SS. DW is recommended for pre-activity routines when neuromuscular readiness is critical.

Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effects of acute static stretching and dynamic warm-up protocols on shoulder function in young adult male athletes with shoulder impingement syndrome:A randomized controlled crossover trial · Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS