Indigenous Data Sovereignty in the United States

This case study delves into the complicated environment of Indigenous data sovereignty in American Indian and Alaska Native communities in the United States. It investigates how historical abuse, mistrust, and exclusion from decision-making processes have resulted in calls for tribal self-determination in data collecting, governance, and utilization. The case demonstrates the insufficiency of national privacy rules in protecting tribal data rights, as well as how data obtained without sufficient tribe engagement can perpetuate harm or lead to erroneous policy. Drawing on the C.A.R.E. paradigm (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics), the study proposes for Indigenous-led data systems that adhere to cultural traditions and promote self-governance. It also explores the ramifications of emerging technologies such as AI and asks whether existing data practices are compatible with Indigenous worldviews. The case, using instances such as the exploitation of Havasupai tribe DNA and the constraints of federal data collecting, advocates for collaborative, culturally aware techniques that empower tribal nations to reclaim control of their digital destiny.

Publication Details

Journal
VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Published
2025-06-20
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indigenous Data Sovereignty in the United States

VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Research Data Management Practices
article

Indigenous Data Sovereignty in the United States

article en

Abstract

This case study delves into the complicated environment of Indigenous data sovereignty in American Indian and Alaska Native communities in the United States. It investigates how historical abuse, mistrust, and exclusion from decision-making processes have resulted in calls for tribal self-determination in data collecting, governance, and utilization. The case demonstrates the insufficiency of national privacy rules in protecting tribal data rights, as well as how data obtained without sufficient tribe engagement can perpetuate harm or lead to erroneous policy. Drawing on the C.A.R.E. paradigm (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics), the study proposes for Indigenous-led data systems that adhere to cultural traditions and promote self-governance. It also explores the ramifications of emerging technologies such as AI and asks whether existing data practices are compatible with Indigenous worldviews. The case, using instances such as the exploitation of Havasupai tribe DNA and the constraints of federal data collecting, advocates for collaborative, culturally aware techniques that empower tribal nations to reclaim control of their digital destiny.

VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.