The case for stronger scrutiny of the deductibility of crypto losses

Crypto losses have the potential to adversely impact the tax base, particularly if they are deducted against income from other profitable sources. There is a key question of fairness as to whether crypto losses should be cross-subsidised by income from other sources that may have nothing to do with cryptoassets at all. This article argues for stronger scrutiny of the deductibility of crypto losses at the stage of determining whether such losses can be set off against income from other sources or at the stage of the shifting of the losses across time and between companies. It explains why crypto losses are of particular concern to tax systems and considers how safeguards can be put in place at both stages to safeguard the tax base. In particular, it suggests that specific crypto legislation should be enacted in order to impose a loose “source matching” requirement on crypto losses. Crypto losses from the carrying on of a trade or business should only be deductible against crypto income. That said, there is probably no need to strictly require that the source of the crypto losses must exactly match the source of the crypto income which is sought to be deducted.

Publication Details

Journal
Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The case for stronger scrutiny of the deductibility of crypto losses

Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University)
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

The case for stronger scrutiny of the deductibility of crypto losses

article en

Abstract

Crypto losses have the potential to adversely impact the tax base, particularly if they are deducted against income from other profitable sources. There is a key question of fairness as to whether crypto losses should be cross-subsidised by income from other sources that may have nothing to do with cryptoassets at all. This article argues for stronger scrutiny of the deductibility of crypto losses at the stage of determining whether such losses can be set off against income from other sources or at the stage of the shifting of the losses across time and between companies. It explains why crypto losses are of particular concern to tax systems and considers how safeguards can be put in place at both stages to safeguard the tax base. In particular, it suggests that specific crypto legislation should be enacted in order to impose a loose “source matching” requirement on crypto losses. Crypto losses from the carrying on of a trade or business should only be deductible against crypto income. That said, there is probably no need to strictly require that the source of the crypto losses must exactly match the source of the crypto income which is sought to be deducted.

Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.