Using Artificial Intelligence to Extract Curriculum Insights from Student Evaluations of Teaching in Higher Education

This project presents a structured, AI-enhanced framework for extracting actionable curriculum insights from student evaluations of teaching (EOT) within professional veterinary education. Set in a competency-based, integrated Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (DVM) program, the process begins by establishing the programmatic context, ensuring that teaching evaluation data is interpreted appropriately. The framework guides users through five key steps: categorizing qualitative feedback into core curriculum domains (Pace, Integration, Instructional Resources, Communication), selecting representative comments, assigning sentiment-based scores, identifying outliers, and generating structured administrator reports. AI-driven tools, including natural language processing and sentiment analysis, support the systematic classification and quantification of student feedback. This methodology promotes consistent, data-informed decisions for curriculum enhancement and instructional development. The process is replicable, scalable, and designed to support continuous quality improvement in veterinary and other health professions education settings.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
Published
2025-05-29
Primary Topic
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Artificial Intelligence to Extract Curriculum Insights from Student Evaluations of Teaching in Higher Education

Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
article

Using Artificial Intelligence to Extract Curriculum Insights from Student Evaluations of Teaching in Higher Education

article en

Abstract

This project presents a structured, AI-enhanced framework for extracting actionable curriculum insights from student evaluations of teaching (EOT) within professional veterinary education. Set in a competency-based, integrated Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (DVM) program, the process begins by establishing the programmatic context, ensuring that teaching evaluation data is interpreted appropriately. The framework guides users through five key steps: categorizing qualitative feedback into core curriculum domains (Pace, Integration, Instructional Resources, Communication), selecting representative comments, assigning sentiment-based scores, identifying outliers, and generating structured administrator reports. AI-driven tools, including natural language processing and sentiment analysis, support the systematic classification and quantification of student feedback. This methodology promotes consistent, data-informed decisions for curriculum enhancement and instructional development. The process is replicable, scalable, and designed to support continuous quality improvement in veterinary and other health professions education settings.

Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.