Implementing recommended falls prevention practices for older patients in hospitals in England: a realist evaluation

<b>Objective: </b>To explore why there is variation in implementation of multifactorial falls prevention practices that are recommended to reduce falls risks for older patients in hospital. <br/><br/><b>Design: </b>Mixed method, realist evaluation. <br/><br/><b>Setting:</b> Three older person and three orthopaedic wards in acute hospitals in England. <br/><br/><b>Participants: </b>Health care professionals including nurses, therapists, and doctors (n=40), and patients aged 65 and over, and carers (n=31).<br/><br/><b>Intervention: </b>We examined mechanisms hypothesised to underpin implementation of multifactorial falls risk assessment and multidomain, personalised prevention plans. <br/><br/><b>Primary and secondary outcome measures: </b>We developed explanation detailing how contextual factors supported or constrained implementation of recommended falls prevention practices. <br/><br/><b>Results: </b>Nurses led delivery of falls risk assessment and prevention planning using their organisation’s Electronic Health Records (EHR) to guide and document these practices. Implementation of recommended practices was influenced by (1) organisational EHR systems that differed in falls risk assessment items they included, (2) competing priorities on nurse time that could reduce falls risk assessment to a tick box exercise, encourage ‘blanket’ rather than tailored interventions, and that constrained nurse time with patients to personalise prevention plans, and (3) established but not recommended falls prevention practices, such as risk screening, that focused multidisciplinary communication on patients screened as at high risk of falls and that emphasised nursing, rather than MDT, responsibility for preventing falls through constant patient supervision.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions: </b>To promote consistent delivery of multifactorial falls prevention practices, and to help ease the nursing burden, organisations should consider how electronic systems and established ward-based practices can be reconfigured to support greater multidisciplinary staff and patient and carer involvement in modification of individual falls risks.<br/>

Publication Details

Journal
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Published
2025-11-11
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing recommended falls prevention practices for older patients in hospitals in England: a realist evaluation

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Implementing recommended falls prevention practices for older patients in hospitals in England: a realist evaluation

article en

Abstract

<b>Objective: </b>To explore why there is variation in implementation of multifactorial falls prevention practices that are recommended to reduce falls risks for older patients in hospital. <br/><br/><b>Design: </b>Mixed method, realist evaluation. <br/><br/><b>Setting:</b> Three older person and three orthopaedic wards in acute hospitals in England. <br/><br/><b>Participants: </b>Health care professionals including nurses, therapists, and doctors (n=40), and patients aged 65 and over, and carers (n=31).<br/><br/><b>Intervention: </b>We examined mechanisms hypothesised to underpin implementation of multifactorial falls risk assessment and multidomain, personalised prevention plans. <br/><br/><b>Primary and secondary outcome measures: </b>We developed explanation detailing how contextual factors supported or constrained implementation of recommended falls prevention practices. <br/><br/><b>Results: </b>Nurses led delivery of falls risk assessment and prevention planning using their organisation’s Electronic Health Records (EHR) to guide and document these practices. Implementation of recommended practices was influenced by (1) organisational EHR systems that differed in falls risk assessment items they included, (2) competing priorities on nurse time that could reduce falls risk assessment to a tick box exercise, encourage ‘blanket’ rather than tailored interventions, and that constrained nurse time with patients to personalise prevention plans, and (3) established but not recommended falls prevention practices, such as risk screening, that focused multidisciplinary communication on patients screened as at high risk of falls and that emphasised nursing, rather than MDT, responsibility for preventing falls through constant patient supervision.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions: </b>To promote consistent delivery of multifactorial falls prevention practices, and to help ease the nursing burden, organisations should consider how electronic systems and established ward-based practices can be reconfigured to support greater multidisciplinary staff and patient and carer involvement in modification of individual falls risks.<br/>

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.