Gender and Sexuality and (D/d)issensus over Liberal Democracy

What can we learn about the politics of gender and sexuality from the emerging dissensus over liberal democracy, and vice versa? This chapter opens the theoretical box of dissensus over liberal democracy to help us understand the role of the EU as a site of contestation around gender and LGBTIQ rights. We argue that to understand these politics, we must first theorise the different functions of dissensus, which we distinguish as (d)issensus that is part of democratic practice and (D)issensus that works as a technology of power. Through this theorising, we highlight how (D)issensus over gender and sexuality is used as a vehicle for polarisation and to undermine the progressive potential of (d)issensus. Only by centring dissensus over the rights afforded to minoritised groups can we start to examine the “health” of liberal democracy. This analysis will thus shed light on the limitations of a policy agenda that stems from a “permissive” consensus around the economic case for equality. The chapter concludes by reflecting on the consequences of (D/d)issensus for political actions and liberal democracy, highlighting the dangers of allowing emancipatory (d)issensus to be displaced by a form of (D)issensus that is destructive and oppressive.

Publication Details

Journal
City Research Online (City University London)
Published
2025-12-17
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender and Sexuality and (D/d)issensus over Liberal Democracy

City Research Online (City University London)
Gender Politics and Representation
article

Gender and Sexuality and (D/d)issensus over Liberal Democracy

article en

Abstract

What can we learn about the politics of gender and sexuality from the emerging dissensus over liberal democracy, and vice versa? This chapter opens the theoretical box of dissensus over liberal democracy to help us understand the role of the EU as a site of contestation around gender and LGBTIQ rights. We argue that to understand these politics, we must first theorise the different functions of dissensus, which we distinguish as (d)issensus that is part of democratic practice and (D)issensus that works as a technology of power. Through this theorising, we highlight how (D)issensus over gender and sexuality is used as a vehicle for polarisation and to undermine the progressive potential of (d)issensus. Only by centring dissensus over the rights afforded to minoritised groups can we start to examine the “health” of liberal democracy. This analysis will thus shed light on the limitations of a policy agenda that stems from a “permissive” consensus around the economic case for equality. The chapter concludes by reflecting on the consequences of (D/d)issensus for political actions and liberal democracy, highlighting the dangers of allowing emancipatory (d)issensus to be displaced by a form of (D)issensus that is destructive and oppressive.

City Research Online (City University London)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Gender Politics and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.