Collaborating with LLM-based Chatbots Can Reduce Prosociality

Ever more frequent and intense collaboration with agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs) at work and in daily life raises the question of whether this affects how humans view and treat each other. We conducted a randomized laboratory experiment with 158 participants who collaborated with either a human or an LLM-based assistant to solve a complex language task. Afterwards, we measured whether the type of collaborator influenced participants’ prosocial attitudes (through implicit association tests) and behavior (in dictator games). Interacting with an LLM-based assistant led to a reduction of prosociality, but only for participants who identified as female. A mediation analysis suggests that these findings are due to an erosion of trust in the LLM-based assistant's benevolence in the female subsample. Such spillover effects of collaborating with AI on interactions between humans must feature in the evaluation of the societal consequences of artificial intelligence and warrant further research.

Publication Details

Journal
TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt)
Published
2025-10-11
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaborating with LLM-based Chatbots Can Reduce Prosociality

TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt)
AI in Service Interactions
article

Collaborating with LLM-based Chatbots Can Reduce Prosociality

article en

Abstract

Ever more frequent and intense collaboration with agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs) at work and in daily life raises the question of whether this affects how humans view and treat each other. We conducted a randomized laboratory experiment with 158 participants who collaborated with either a human or an LLM-based assistant to solve a complex language task. Afterwards, we measured whether the type of collaborator influenced participants’ prosocial attitudes (through implicit association tests) and behavior (in dictator games). Interacting with an LLM-based assistant led to a reduction of prosociality, but only for participants who identified as female. A mediation analysis suggests that these findings are due to an erosion of trust in the LLM-based assistant's benevolence in the female subsample. Such spillover effects of collaborating with AI on interactions between humans must feature in the evaluation of the societal consequences of artificial intelligence and warrant further research.

TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.