Radiation Awareness and Occupational Concerns Among Radiographers and Students:Poster presentation

Abstract<br/>Purpose or Learning Objective<br/>To assess the knowledge, perceptions, and concerns of professionals working with ionizing radiation (IR) regarding their occupational exposure and its implications on their health, fertility, and offspring.<br/><br/>Methods or Background<br/>This cross-sectional survey included European radiographers and students and was distributed via social media and professional bodies (EFRS and Danish Society of Radiographers) from March to July 2024. The questionnaire covered demographics, knowledge of IR, and concerns, using a five-point Likert scale.<br/><br/>Results or Findings<br/>A total of 629 participants from 32 countries were included: 414 women (mean age 34.34 ± 12.18), 208 men (mean age 38.27 ± 11.81), and 7 non-binary or undisclosed individuals. Of these 28.30% were students. Mean exposure time was 10.69 years ± 10.68.<br/>Overall, 29.77% of respondents agreed that radiation exposure could negatively impact their health, 23.75% expressed concerns about fertility, and 18.59% about their children's health. No significant differences were observed between sex in these responses.<br/>Of non-student respondents only 0.44% of respondents did not fully understand the occupational risks of IR, 5.77% were dissatisfied with their radiation protection education, and 4.66% felt unqualified to inform patients. Additionally, 1.99% were unsure about self-protection, and 4.00% felt they lacked the necessary protection means. Regarding the International Basic Safety Standard, a total of 28.95% felt not up to date while the number was 12.42% for the National Legislation.<br/>Conclusion<br/>This study highlights concerns regarding IR and related health with up to 30% expressing concerns. While only a minority of respondents felt they needed more education or resources to protect themselves, a third lacked knowledge on the International Basic Safety Standards.<br/><br/>Limitations<br/>Selection bias could be present as this topic may have attracted respondents with greater concerns.<br/><br/>Ethics<br/>The University of Southern Denmark Research Ethics Committee (23/70920) approved this project on 8 December 2023. Before accessing the questionnaire, participants were informed about the study's purpose and were assured of the confidentiality of their responses. Only those who provided their informed consent proceeded to complete the questionnaire

Publication Details

Journal
University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark)
Published
2025-02-27
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiation Awareness and Occupational Concerns Among Radiographers and Students:Poster presentation

University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark)
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Radiation Awareness and Occupational Concerns Among Radiographers and Students:Poster presentation

article en

Abstract

Abstract<br/>Purpose or Learning Objective<br/>To assess the knowledge, perceptions, and concerns of professionals working with ionizing radiation (IR) regarding their occupational exposure and its implications on their health, fertility, and offspring.<br/><br/>Methods or Background<br/>This cross-sectional survey included European radiographers and students and was distributed via social media and professional bodies (EFRS and Danish Society of Radiographers) from March to July 2024. The questionnaire covered demographics, knowledge of IR, and concerns, using a five-point Likert scale.<br/><br/>Results or Findings<br/>A total of 629 participants from 32 countries were included: 414 women (mean age 34.34 ± 12.18), 208 men (mean age 38.27 ± 11.81), and 7 non-binary or undisclosed individuals. Of these 28.30% were students. Mean exposure time was 10.69 years ± 10.68.<br/>Overall, 29.77% of respondents agreed that radiation exposure could negatively impact their health, 23.75% expressed concerns about fertility, and 18.59% about their children's health. No significant differences were observed between sex in these responses.<br/>Of non-student respondents only 0.44% of respondents did not fully understand the occupational risks of IR, 5.77% were dissatisfied with their radiation protection education, and 4.66% felt unqualified to inform patients. Additionally, 1.99% were unsure about self-protection, and 4.00% felt they lacked the necessary protection means. Regarding the International Basic Safety Standard, a total of 28.95% felt not up to date while the number was 12.42% for the National Legislation.<br/>Conclusion<br/>This study highlights concerns regarding IR and related health with up to 30% expressing concerns. While only a minority of respondents felt they needed more education or resources to protect themselves, a third lacked knowledge on the International Basic Safety Standards.<br/><br/>Limitations<br/>Selection bias could be present as this topic may have attracted respondents with greater concerns.<br/><br/>Ethics<br/>The University of Southern Denmark Research Ethics Committee (23/70920) approved this project on 8 December 2023. Before accessing the questionnaire, participants were informed about the study's purpose and were assured of the confidentiality of their responses. Only those who provided their informed consent proceeded to complete the questionnaire

University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.