Identification, assessment and provision of special education needs in England: a cross-sectional survey to compare perceptions of young people, parents/carers and professionals

In England, the legislative framework supporting learners identified with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) is, once again, under scrutiny following the UK government’s 2023 ‘SEND and alternative provision improvement plan’. It is timely, therefore, to seek the views of children and young people with SEN, their parents/carers, and the professionals working with them, to inform future policy decisions that will affect their daily lives. This study reports on three self-report, cross-sectional surveys completed by young people with SEN (N = 77), parents/carers (N = 770) and SEN professionals (N = 863). We present descriptive statistics to compare the perceptions of these stakeholders across three key aspects of the SEN process: identification, assessment, and provision. In addition, we describe survey responses according to the most frequently reported SEN groups, and parent responses according to the number of children they care for with SEN. Results show negative perceptions of assessment for multiple groups, and mixed perceptions of identification and provision. Specifically, the results highlight implications around parent/carer advocacy, information for families, children and young people’s involvement, professionals’ training, and the local context of provision.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-05-09
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification, assessment and provision of special education needs in England: a cross-sectional survey to compare perceptions of young people, parents/carers and professionals

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Family and Disability Support Research
article

Identification, assessment and provision of special education needs in England: a cross-sectional survey to compare perceptions of young people, parents/carers and professionals

article en

Abstract

In England, the legislative framework supporting learners identified with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) is, once again, under scrutiny following the UK government’s 2023 ‘SEND and alternative provision improvement plan’. It is timely, therefore, to seek the views of children and young people with SEN, their parents/carers, and the professionals working with them, to inform future policy decisions that will affect their daily lives. This study reports on three self-report, cross-sectional surveys completed by young people with SEN (N = 77), parents/carers (N = 770) and SEN professionals (N = 863). We present descriptive statistics to compare the perceptions of these stakeholders across three key aspects of the SEN process: identification, assessment, and provision. In addition, we describe survey responses according to the most frequently reported SEN groups, and parent responses according to the number of children they care for with SEN. Results show negative perceptions of assessment for multiple groups, and mixed perceptions of identification and provision. Specifically, the results highlight implications around parent/carer advocacy, information for families, children and young people’s involvement, professionals’ training, and the local context of provision.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Family and Disability Support Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.