Flexibly unpredictable? : The AI Act as a regulator of a moving target

This chapter has its origins in a Swedish version but has been updated through studies conducted as part of a Nordic research project on the 0governance of AI and automated decision-making in the public sector, and within the framework of a research cluster on the AI welfare state. The analysis aims to deepen our understanding of how European AI regulation is grappling with regulating a moving target as exceptional as AI development, and to show how these insights are relevant from a technology governance and supervisory perspective. In the chapter's conclusion, I highlight the need for structures for skills development, collaboration between public authorities, and active interpretation and communication of both existing legislation and future application of the AI Act. The emphasis here is on the flexible elements of the AI Act that defer certain normative issues by broadening the Commission's mandate, or by commissioning standards to be developed to assist regulatory compliance. Particular attention is paid to generative AI, as this is a fast-moving field of technology that has significantly influenced the legislative process.

Publication Details

Journal
Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Published
2025-11-05
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flexibly unpredictable? : The AI Act as a regulator of a moving target

Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Flexibly unpredictable? : The AI Act as a regulator of a moving target

article en

Abstract

This chapter has its origins in a Swedish version but has been updated through studies conducted as part of a Nordic research project on the 0governance of AI and automated decision-making in the public sector, and within the framework of a research cluster on the AI welfare state. The analysis aims to deepen our understanding of how European AI regulation is grappling with regulating a moving target as exceptional as AI development, and to show how these insights are relevant from a technology governance and supervisory perspective. In the chapter's conclusion, I highlight the need for structures for skills development, collaboration between public authorities, and active interpretation and communication of both existing legislation and future application of the AI Act. The emphasis here is on the flexible elements of the AI Act that defer certain normative issues by broadening the Commission's mandate, or by commissioning standards to be developed to assist regulatory compliance. Particular attention is paid to generative AI, as this is a fast-moving field of technology that has significantly influenced the legislative process.

Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.