Evaluating the implementation and impact of new models of nursing course deliveries: an exploratory case study

Background<br/><br/>Alternative models of preregistration nursing deliveries have evolved in the UK driven by different professional standards, workforce needs and healthcare requirements (Council of Deans of Health, 2024). These include blended learning degrees, nursing degree apprenticeships and accelerated programmes. However, little is known about the impact of these routes on student’s learning outcomes and practice readiness.<br/><br/>Aim: The study investigated the implementation and outcomes of the different models of preregistration nurse education within a post-92 UK university<br/><br/>Methodology: One hundred and forty four student adult nurses completed an online survey using a university-wide email campaign. The outcomes were learning effectiveness (perception of students on attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction scales), digital competencies (perception of student’s digital skills) and practice readiness (student’s perceptions of understanding nurse’s responsibilities). Parallel and Exploratory Factor Analysis ( Akhtar-Danesh, 2017), verified the expected factor structure. Thematic analysis (Braun &amp; Clarke, 2006) was used to analyse qualitative responses.<br/><br/>Results: The masters blended student group were more likely to view their course as relevant compared to the undergraduate blended student group (mean difference = -1.1912*, p &lt; 0.05). The other individual comparisons were non-significant. The five qualitative themes include: 1. Having improved digital skills, 2. Valuable learning experience, 3. Fulfilling other commitments 4. Being unprepared for the workplace, and 5. Overwhelming course<br/><br/>Conclusion: Overall there were few differences between course groups, indicating that the different courses are equally effective in achieving learning outcomes. The master’s blended course is viewed as more relevant by participants than the undergraduate program, indicating its effectiveness in aligning educational content with professional goals. There were no difference between improvements in digital skills and valuing learning experiences but most students expressed concerns about workplace preparedness. The study indicates that blended learning courses can provide a learning experience that is comparable to traditional study modes.

Publication Details

Journal
Pure (Coventry University)
Published
2025-06-30
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the implementation and impact of new models of nursing course deliveries: an exploratory case study

Pure (Coventry University)
Nursing education and management
article

Evaluating the implementation and impact of new models of nursing course deliveries: an exploratory case study

article en

Abstract

Background<br/><br/>Alternative models of preregistration nursing deliveries have evolved in the UK driven by different professional standards, workforce needs and healthcare requirements (Council of Deans of Health, 2024). These include blended learning degrees, nursing degree apprenticeships and accelerated programmes. However, little is known about the impact of these routes on student’s learning outcomes and practice readiness.<br/><br/>Aim: The study investigated the implementation and outcomes of the different models of preregistration nurse education within a post-92 UK university<br/><br/>Methodology: One hundred and forty four student adult nurses completed an online survey using a university-wide email campaign. The outcomes were learning effectiveness (perception of students on attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction scales), digital competencies (perception of student’s digital skills) and practice readiness (student’s perceptions of understanding nurse’s responsibilities). Parallel and Exploratory Factor Analysis ( Akhtar-Danesh, 2017), verified the expected factor structure. Thematic analysis (Braun &amp; Clarke, 2006) was used to analyse qualitative responses.<br/><br/>Results: The masters blended student group were more likely to view their course as relevant compared to the undergraduate blended student group (mean difference = -1.1912*, p &lt; 0.05). The other individual comparisons were non-significant. The five qualitative themes include: 1. Having improved digital skills, 2. Valuable learning experience, 3. Fulfilling other commitments 4. Being unprepared for the workplace, and 5. Overwhelming course<br/><br/>Conclusion: Overall there were few differences between course groups, indicating that the different courses are equally effective in achieving learning outcomes. The master’s blended course is viewed as more relevant by participants than the undergraduate program, indicating its effectiveness in aligning educational content with professional goals. There were no difference between improvements in digital skills and valuing learning experiences but most students expressed concerns about workplace preparedness. The study indicates that blended learning courses can provide a learning experience that is comparable to traditional study modes.

Pure (Coventry University)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Nursing education and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating the implementation and impact of new models of nursing course deliveries: an exploratory case study · Pure (Coventry University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS