“Sorry, we don’t have any LGBTQI+ service users”

This article addresses the persistent gap between the ethical foundations of social work-rooted in human rights, social justice, and anti‐oppressive practices - and the exclusionary experiences of LGBTQI+ people within Slovenian social work and care services. It examines how these services respond to LGBTQI+ needs, identifies the typical patterns of practice, and explores how general equity principles can be more effectively translated into everyday work. The article draws on a narrative synthesis of three research projects conducted between 2018 and 2021, focusing on the experiences of LGBTQI+ older people, children, and youth in Slovenian social and care services. These include two European projects and a small‐scale qualitative study during the Covid‐19 epidemic. Based on these findings, the article identifies recurring themes and patterns in the response of services, including instances of openly inappropriate treatment, denial through universalist approaches, the “transparent closet,” and examples of inclusive and affirming practices. While exclusion remains widespread, the article highlights promising practices - particularly within NGO‐led initiatives - and calls for systemic change.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Published
2025-11-14
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Sorry, we don’t have any LGBTQI+ service users”

Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

“Sorry, we don’t have any LGBTQI+ service users”

article en

Abstract

This article addresses the persistent gap between the ethical foundations of social work-rooted in human rights, social justice, and anti‐oppressive practices - and the exclusionary experiences of LGBTQI+ people within Slovenian social work and care services. It examines how these services respond to LGBTQI+ needs, identifies the typical patterns of practice, and explores how general equity principles can be more effectively translated into everyday work. The article draws on a narrative synthesis of three research projects conducted between 2018 and 2021, focusing on the experiences of LGBTQI+ older people, children, and youth in Slovenian social and care services. These include two European projects and a small‐scale qualitative study during the Covid‐19 epidemic. Based on these findings, the article identifies recurring themes and patterns in the response of services, including instances of openly inappropriate treatment, denial through universalist approaches, the “transparent closet,” and examples of inclusive and affirming practices. While exclusion remains widespread, the article highlights promising practices - particularly within NGO‐led initiatives - and calls for systemic change.

Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Sorry, we don’t have any LGBTQI+ service users” · Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS