The Race for Global AI Dominance: USA vs. China How Do We Measure Who’s Ahead?

This case study investigates the intensifying race between the United States and China for global dominance in artificial intelligence (AI), emphasizing that leadership in AI is not just about innovation but also about the ability to diffuse and adopt technologies across society. While both nations are leading in AI development, the case highlights political scientist Jeffrey Ding’s argument that China suffers from a “diffusion deficit,” struggling to implement AI widely beyond elite urban centers. Using examples such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT and China’s DeepSeek, the study contrasts U.S. first-mover advantages with China’s ambition to define global AI standards, often underpinned by authoritarian governance models. The case examines the relationship between innovation and diffusion processes with worldwide power transformations as well as economic development stages and ethical AI governance standards. The study investigates China's expanding digital authoritarianism exports which create worries about surveillance tools employed for human rights suppression. Through the lens of innovation capacity vs. diffusion capacity, the case encourages students to critically examine not only who is winning the AI race, but also what kind of global future each model of AI development might promote.

Publication Details

Journal
VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Published
2025-06-18
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Race for Global AI Dominance: USA vs. China How Do We Measure Who’s Ahead?

VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Digital Education and Society
article

The Race for Global AI Dominance: USA vs. China How Do We Measure Who’s Ahead?

article en

Abstract

This case study investigates the intensifying race between the United States and China for global dominance in artificial intelligence (AI), emphasizing that leadership in AI is not just about innovation but also about the ability to diffuse and adopt technologies across society. While both nations are leading in AI development, the case highlights political scientist Jeffrey Ding’s argument that China suffers from a “diffusion deficit,” struggling to implement AI widely beyond elite urban centers. Using examples such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT and China’s DeepSeek, the study contrasts U.S. first-mover advantages with China’s ambition to define global AI standards, often underpinned by authoritarian governance models. The case examines the relationship between innovation and diffusion processes with worldwide power transformations as well as economic development stages and ethical AI governance standards. The study investigates China's expanding digital authoritarianism exports which create worries about surveillance tools employed for human rights suppression. Through the lens of innovation capacity vs. diffusion capacity, the case encourages students to critically examine not only who is winning the AI race, but also what kind of global future each model of AI development might promote.

VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.